IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dbound] [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 April 2019 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE9712017A; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yqeVKHvVRD8z; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F165D120172; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id w24so2119881plp.2; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 12:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=zQmHF4nLMHqRVtIre9MxcEK3ViqSxg+LKRr5uLnfndI=; b=BvmvDayD4CksoGLGNj2wBgPfSb+r0wnRTQVxcNqaqftJmzRBXQn7VWZDqGNAiitwcF BEctn8O7vt8oX56WaJp6AsY+Ygat4rvHkKIbtUBcjCPEbtKcKsnfHM7tIU7PqQ3kHSsI CwWn6BvBm0SPkmHEI39iTFkrEywdJdDXVzWeCEKOuGRXpXJcpdNHZAyVWyFLtDiFHaWI QPogA5gX+PlYBWR8ookQcKkb0++057r3Hgzf48G3kKLnb0My4Fj0VNxTHhjopCo3Bcu8 f65Pkbfp2iNI0zCNkzK3KVolkt9OPHk5mx4LPmjAxtcBWc8oD4QXjWEu60OEhDD5yI6B 9gPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=zQmHF4nLMHqRVtIre9MxcEK3ViqSxg+LKRr5uLnfndI=; b=bCIXqByJHAP/wZQR6yb+CDeWAeZznOfHE0GzhM73qyHhG/qO87nVBdewTzwfa9IWwB h0hghYPTMHmvTtz0uYEIrjBnC190vVeqBHTRCrLePtqoIIFMsVSAPuHYQgkB/bWqBOcV bgOlvaXSO6sNYB456eLQaMoLEYPJGuZY/hq0cWPB0BxXrgY53k/dVayq2zdBigQipLQp xgsvyUYUYA3QGA/vChRxStv1GWKRfFYehatGGtUcxdrT4cUZiJIDvAKUnyIZD+Hcj9uS IVSEHLWfcaXQLt2WSXIeQMgZNr+uGIjcbzY3P2YokHjBAAcokkCqvYRcSaDswvpItIpR cn7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU5wwsZW8TJYOBIJnydsD57ZjEMkXb46ZYiwl0VNMccFwfpyJ0a TugpYoW/P1jnRjslvzxy22o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8L4yQPQV30Gi9ZwHdQmhIsaF/hvFpd7wiPHlfUemnnHbrfiotULATjk7UAAbBhgBjlftOhw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7841:: with SMTP id e1mr1688893pln.303.1554319188729; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 12:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.248.162] ([104.153.224.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i2sm24400685pfo.9.2019.04.03.12.19.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Apr 2019 12:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16E227)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1904031459480.21189@ary.qy>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 20:19:41 +0100
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net, dmarc@ietf.org, dbound@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AFE01C0B-E47E-4D4E-B60C-FA0810BBE8F8@gmail.com>
References: <20190403175820.8391420115F376@ary.qy> <2445c121-f77b-0fa2-ca6a-402479abb5a7@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1904031430270.21189@ary.qy> <7e61b445-3844-f769-6a59-16fa396388d0@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1904031459480.21189@ary.qy>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/83T8JYGipc3CCKe2uFmoscW0r80>
Subject: Re: [dbound] [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 19:19:52 -0000

I was going to say CAA but that’s 6 years old. 



From my high tech gadget

> On Apr 3, 2019, at 20:06, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> Now, about /end to end/ support, not just publishing...
>> 
>> Please provide some examples comparable to your proposed use case.  That is, what are new RRs that are getting well-scaled, on-going use, defined in say the last 5 years?
> 
> There aren't many other than maybe CDS and CDSKEY.  TLSA was defined in 2012 and Viktor says it's getting pretty wide use now, particularly considering that it needs DNSSEC.
> 
> On the other hand, there hasn't been anything with new server semantics since NSEC3 in 2008.
> 
> This is really an argument for dnsop, not dmarc or dbound.
> 
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email