Re: [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) Draft

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 27 February 2019 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC3F130FFB; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:26:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vMR0a4Ran0yv; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:26:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EA5E130FF4; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:26:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:44120) by ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1gz22P-000dqM-fa (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:26:29 +0000
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:26:29 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
cc: "Brotman, Alexander" <Alexander_Brotman@comcast.com>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "dbound@ietf.org" <dbound@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902271037500.21061@bofh.nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902271622580.19193@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <5de9ba1c3ae34edb9c7f39e0e9c3b143@PACDCEX19.cable.comcast.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902270920580.8896@bofh.nohats.ca> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902271037500.21061@bofh.nohats.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/Fkb2SFCWeWyOtOok5juQp1M99DE>
Subject: Re: [dbound] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) Draft
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:26:38 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>; wrote:
>
> I do still have a concern that this is using its own signature schemes
> embedded in the records instead of relying on DNSSEC. But I guess
> that's just the world we live in now.

I wonder if it should instead be a SIG(SOA) where the signer is the
primary domain, but I'm not sure what the other bits of this SIG record
should say. Also, I wasn't around when DNSSEC worked like that, so there
are likely to be all sorts of good reasons why this is not a fun and
enticing prospect.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>;  http://dotat.at/
no one shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance, or conformity