Re: [dbound] The Fate of DBOUND

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6851294E3 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:27:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NlsGYODoZNzJ for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com (mail-yw0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B2221293DB for <dbound@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id a10so143033389ywa.3 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:27:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=m+nnFZpnj4snZcL6STdjTONtbpsS79tXvWvCXZFUAMw=; b=pKchMI0OlGjjUObZTTru6psyrywH6Iruv9ub8pZ4jCuEedd7P2yHFcr3KOwNaLYAQf cgwaHqnlwIK2eqF6/Rg8IR+ujqPGk32OQ76m1TU9m3H6ovCYRgM7iCwrysrYAQQbsTVx ys5IMD610Gp1o98g74usrebBH/hKIS6yd+1mlLpgxRGYb1y1n2oKMeKbpmHTCUkgn7Z4 lu/JAtJne8n7/N1iSNJ4oyTb8fkb95YjSZzsz+qTNJzxd+6AcWgqwqBcJPGdsv8eX/Vz rfVHMcPpVXL6vB1o1Y5pqVg6qhtxfqmXXEu7d3YVdg7xpuTfGbtIfT7NuxLZsYEkBnpi qDYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=m+nnFZpnj4snZcL6STdjTONtbpsS79tXvWvCXZFUAMw=; b=cgEPY/RQuMWEO+B9XiKN7gjFd/I/hXX7abIWOKOYImvdSh5pXImGRt46KqLsw0MlIm ZIxBdJrjutGuTxNL9AuEpoTVZmAxRfdUuNeHQ+jYMotoON5HXHu1kFspKKxM0Ky2yX0D UwYBpE4Zp1sjvrBVey9JqMOEVJdYPoPhlADot02hRDqb06ccNdDMoM2cNDJLqhCbxcEX gKXHLM/I6qwus7B+HZ65eXmNesmxSAznsx3YCUlbuULvYlCYvVAyeMFy4pifUA9i5/ri pm13M6uLHzunWmQKY6KDFcFaXpGD/aWalWk/OuU8wkk+o3+GEHbF6N+cpckCBaGtzX9M aehw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngve19sbD5E6/t2THvn5apv4qdGMntkouH8GPNBb5i+F+psEhJH1zsaqQj1eKrV8AXYO8h4EZXUNwOodUHA==
X-Received: by 10.129.99.195 with SMTP id x186mr155188ywb.182.1479338867640; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:27:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.111.130 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:27:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20161116220656.GF56064@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <CAL0qLwb_JzkL9x=mikNrk8z943vHgJ2qrwew7Ucrd+PbL_wRqA@mail.gmail.com> <CB3C24CC-9FB8-4F41-BC36-4773968934B0@vpnc.org> <CAL0qLwaW2umAumVjGds8mYhSQfwtLf2+Fbgdo+zOqx_9QV3urw@mail.gmail.com> <20161116220656.GF56064@mx2.yitter.info>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:27:46 +0900
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaW8LL8HejVeCxQ6rL9j9mD_wokRHo8cRx463X6aT2wnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114920f8b54f700541736b83"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/GSRcOItFGDq91d9mtxTaB4wm8rQ>
Cc: "dbound@ietf.org" <dbound@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dbound] The Fate of DBOUND
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:27:49 -0000

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

>
> I don't think that's a reasonable interpretation of Experimental,
> because I think it's too prescriptive, but I certainly intended to add
> to the draft I've worked on some experiment parameters.  What I had in
> mind was this:
> [...]
>

Mainly I base that on the one Experimental AD-sponsored draft I've had
published previously and what's written in that IESG statement.  I'm
anticipating what we'll be asked when sending any of these documents for
publication.  Maybe this IESG is softer than my past experience.

-MSK