IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dbound] DBOUND interest @ IETF 114?

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Thu, 28 July 2022 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6A4C1A649F for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redbarn.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PdDpYA8jrQ23 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from util.redbarn.org (util.redbarn.org [24.104.150.222]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650B9C16ED00 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by util.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2776C1A23D2 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:30:28 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=redbarn.org; s=util; t=1659029428; bh=4jP2p7pxCJIYyU3panmPq9ZsG5NNApiS810Ks02x4vs=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=sEIFpYNWaokkmtRoimAgbsVxUk0/biNGKL+GGl10VG2slzvjE+vo9qeuarj+hymYN OGWIbXqWajJejQ7JGJXS5rh5JUEUPZu3TbUU2TKiObmSs8QY/OLakGdXiEc0qyRhOP tXLDJ99hiOiHWi/opDImmrq24y+RwWiRLXmcoQjg=
Received: from [24.104.150.165] (dhcp-165.access.rits.tisf.net [24.104.150.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2CAF7597E for <dbound@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
To: "dbound@ietf.org" <dbound@ietf.org>
References: <1658868935831.47380@amazon.com> <CAL0qLwaciDeTxem_X-iUeTSoVSttEYORUqFhx72zymGDe9jEWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwaaNd-0=psHz8qp27EEF2xZmTuWRmMVTgnsRKJnHZmbcA@mail.gmail.com> <dee4131a-e42-66aa-1a15-2519a59d9aed@samweiler.com>
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Message-ID: <ce17236f-cd2c-63b5-4fa9-09c898424b13@redbarn.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:30:26 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.56
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <dee4131a-e42-66aa-1a15-2519a59d9aed@samweiler.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/MxNoxz3WmY7qvATg16WujMM_14c>
Subject: Re: [dbound] DBOUND interest @ IETF 114?
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:30:33 -0000

thank you sam. see inline.

Samuel Weiler wrote on 2022-07-28 06:37:
> This late in the week, schedules (mine, included) get crowded.  May I 
> suggest a virtual gathering sometime other than this week?

fine by me, but if a bar bof can happen this week as well, i think that 
will help the effort. noting, i am not at ietf so would not be part of 
it, but i still think it would be useful. read that as you will.

> Also, the group should be aware of the First Party Sets proposal, which 
> did not garner consensus support in W3C's Privacy CG: 
> https://github.com/WICG/first-party-sets
> 
> As well as:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-brotman-rdbd-03

these both solve a superset of the current "effective PSL" goals, and a 
short read convinced me that they are too complicated to be adopted.

the PSL maintainers did not seek consensus before starting out, they saw 
and solved a problem. the features they thought would be useful outside 
of the browser community never took off. i think there are lessons there.

-- 
P Vixie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email