IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dbound] Informal DBOUND meeting

Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net> Wed, 20 July 2016 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <casey@deccio.net>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A921C12D847 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=deccio.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KXemHbbuXm7V for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com (mail-vk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92CF412D88D for <dbound@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id s189so76239153vkh.1 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=deccio.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=C3U6o8QXIaAz4EEuvOFyqvbwagbmNR9XefYYletek2A=; b=iCn2xCTKur1i+JXlhE4d5Q2WQB02ChO5fY0eIEqQ2Xp/zOvqwA8LbI6+rlkSYL0LfJ LehvMW2Lz53HAlApfSbzjMi78t3QBA8wd5K/m23lnd3JYWq9C8ahvOefQ0zIeuYWALcl grPEeo63seiTXx3HvCpWmw0BRNwrB1jNSDpzs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=C3U6o8QXIaAz4EEuvOFyqvbwagbmNR9XefYYletek2A=; b=B+4+lbzeQXMAMux6W5xvf/DKU7zeJCwYZN4tIsQHmTwLVFsrJxZipKCjyghSWQosJP r1nHSZEbEdnq8gI7jct1xt0xs1ELdjsBflrxkSAVN/JdlD29DijOJIuwXSREnur5gtOZ rMqmNTudQRM1ktNw/EsBxe0ldsTLkboL0rzC6CU9zlA/FfOdeLyPeePq+9T+5C8r00gx mCYlRi6WcmO0ij1edZ5fI6QDl8dpgz2ees/Cp0ZwT/JXCco2DGOifvpvsVKYBQvhuaKA h7WoalZdBifgw7XxoPMo4J9QV2twhnwJEyynoaloLV9Y+dD/+iujePtqNa585Au9CUtg VH1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJbetaiuXrPGrZmtIG7UVlUO+rLLQ//7wOJxLulzM+V82DlB9j74/UHtowyvYQKqEeCLq3sS3FLDzaUqQ==
X-Received: by 10.176.64.72 with SMTP id h66mr23277630uad.97.1469032192557; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.67.135 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEKtLiTQfgAVcx202N2mKSpaQqkztbNPByCL12qMpzpaUkWucg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEKtLiRfvf8D9qXnRi2YG8Wp_dBmR=30HW3LHto+DjyEgXZYFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEKtLiTQfgAVcx202N2mKSpaQqkztbNPByCL12qMpzpaUkWucg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:29:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEKtLiQEPoBYPQVFxneZSJ-W5=zEp5PPkGSQH9p67WXr20oG-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dbound@ietf.org" <dbound@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0485760070b9053813b652"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/Nou8cFB8n_K5T6NmgbkinYYT-G0>
Subject: Re: [dbound] Informal DBOUND meeting
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:29:56 -0000

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> While the DBOUND WG is not scheduled to meet this week, I'd like to
>> propose an unofficial meeting of interested DBOUND parties...  The agenda
>> is loose but involves discussion of where we are, where to go, etc.
>>
>
> While the ultimate timing might not work for everyone, it appears that a
> poll might be more useful than back-and-forths on the mailing list to
> assess preferences.  So here it is:
>
> http://doodle.com/poll/cgkv9ypirw8vvig6
>
> If you have interest in the meeting, please participate in the poll.  This
> will not only help me nail down a time but also get an idea of how many
> might attend.
>

>From the handful of responses, it looks like Friday morning is collectively
the best time for folks, with Thursday evening being a close second.  If
you have interest and haven't answered the poll, please do so, so I can
make the final call.

Casey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email