Re: [dbound] [art] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) Draft

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 27 February 2019 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B713F131024 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:21:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=Rc1No4fB; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Ah7oPYff
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V34LnVbZXLbv for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:21:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97B4130EE1 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:21:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 5745 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2019 17:21:43 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=166f.5c76c727.k1902; bh=8nLo+XBXvDYNZi0Qmp36ML6pAfTf1K2CVFX/G7DaP+g=; b=Rc1No4fBSZsOmoJSHcZrMhSiGQIqF9uxyCx7nY6wmsid7MCQke9OrzXwH6+ZjeE8DGN6Qxmy+jKQtC2meqWS/ICXgyFbX0R5R3faS88EtW9z6GUDv9hfDPR5nrzfw8yksHjKax5fmwyKDegSXrt/x20ZjuKClw8H9hGuZp4e3osB4n9quaiTJ2siG97BpL7/vdpkpPBrAUOW9+qcblSvwKnFcHbkIXYQloWx8RiZdggu4CYWuMMigdFh7t8eBlqt
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=166f.5c76c727.k1902; bh=8nLo+XBXvDYNZi0Qmp36ML6pAfTf1K2CVFX/G7DaP+g=; b=Ah7oPYffUHnLYglQZ5cW9JYCGGGugw+N4TroHMn+/XO0GasC0+fDHv5YnFd5j5kGe1AYuTGdebRp3m/UFkwWD1nTbdPkV+GjaPV5Gn0CjbAzvKiuKSynmQfA12DFuVWTbNQ/aNe7k4KN4x3/fkCKSzYVMaiSwQjwbCaBMrls4/e5xUDES3Id+LA+SdJdpPUllFPCQCs4KHuMWAiEDJM6tBHU8wCWaiM/N4HM73aM3/erBThJ5P8B1omzWEzVAB50
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 27 Feb 2019 17:21:43 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 10303200F57CE0; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:21:42 -0500 (EST)
Date: 27 Feb 2019 12:21:42 -0500
Message-Id: <20190227172143.10303200F57CE0@ary.local>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: art@ietf.org, dbound@ietf.org
Cc: paul@nohats.ca
In-Reply-To: <A59F2895-6369-4E84-A86B-C6585AB29D83@nohats.ca>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/UcstQ_q4DiSZBJ2EX9R36T2ONb4>
Subject: Re: [dbound] [art] [DNSOP] Related Domains By DNS (RDBD) Draft
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:21:48 -0000

In article <A59F2895-6369-4E84-A86B-C6585AB29D83@nohats.ca>; you write:
>If it is really only a variant, you should just DNAME it to the other domain ?

I really wish people would stop saying this.  There is a long list of
well known reasons that DNAME doesn't work for aliasing 2LD variants.
That's why .CAT used to do it but doesn't any more.