IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dbound] DBOUND interest @ IETF 114?

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 28 July 2022 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5268C136312 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c-MS_tpNNV19 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70648C14F728 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id u3so274193lfl.3 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+jnp4dRfeyat+qV7JtOsPTMorkydBKEPnQom6mL37VE=; b=ZUq6GbPHsqRc6fT/7hoRSuRZVCIy2b/8MXIx6MD1E2/sGl4pugMBALhB1BwiEabBOt b3W5bUdfr2+sYnsZ/xGyCDkma819VhmXN/WiMcjKXuUz/4GK8XLuJ4AzZhLqU4q+I1Z2 mAeUdpq1mJKvJw3Vo6K+jrIupx3Q46B+R8DjlYbvIzy+9tkoiSLHzjXdoKXpyNFM7Utg 6EWddfXZoVU3aIcUocRMwy687Ll9oI/eSjv6EOaR39wbbm17TiW6e2haN7HmrxASgYA9 8Gj8tqtDNmjfmYLsduMFr7j4lKV9vZ/lXcb1QvQOdY5JFC+v61fHnbaLEUoh+Yrxvrnu CUWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+jnp4dRfeyat+qV7JtOsPTMorkydBKEPnQom6mL37VE=; b=Zfc+FwpJ1PQtnN0gX1Y1xMnhQOOwRp3J2RrgX5jdkZQn6xi7VuDJqfVz4Qa8TPy2dY tiUiq7jp9Br7uBubL4oML85b1tuzsTAYiBzHJHsfuFi0N7nzoBOn/ex5o7BwAuLwJOft k8fxLlzQLEJhybJOYmhgexlicbeZ3MiwXCzU08gbTpIUKngq12xOmO46He+esQsIWnAa VzO2rPbJqhm16SDZonCA6VqiM1Oid19FJHX7P13zo4oTrFC70IOiELb0gRVxnNAUsqmR rthxeohrxXy8BFJaZe03Yxf6Q30J5jGsQq/myy07wK83p8i5MtsBii5v2tCaLvfH5NL6 9/uw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8kmnsFu6lGEbP8XrFcTLk2szIG8rFgTSiDpk7Hc1a9WpMLQ5cn CsPvEmdS1tfuR2/BiODfEtr4AyGLT543xesfUbykKc5+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tUDAdaw0t7VZkT+Vc7dKZyVtPYxa0KcPIeLnRgko/6Vb9z9xD1/zZEt+U2zDVy4d7Zob7KPlrtBWCv3VTCvwc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3fa2:b0:48a:16df:266f with SMTP id x34-20020a0565123fa200b0048a16df266fmr9527481lfa.414.1659017550317; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1658868935831.47380@amazon.com> <CAL0qLwaciDeTxem_X-iUeTSoVSttEYORUqFhx72zymGDe9jEWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwaaNd-0=psHz8qp27EEF2xZmTuWRmMVTgnsRKJnHZmbcA@mail.gmail.com> <81C5E85B-9E6B-4AB8-97C3-273F53339B41@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <81C5E85B-9E6B-4AB8-97C3-273F53339B41@vpnc.org>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:12:18 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwY+9q9f5PfFf=KS31eyAxU2sCfGmQjUFQQ2_OMNgV77jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Cc: dbound@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c34f5905e4de1f0e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/ZaUYD9EmCb21kBu0_aifUviWejg>
Subject: Re: [dbound] DBOUND interest @ IETF 114?
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:12:37 -0000

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 7:52 AM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> What is the purpose of meeting f2f on short notice, particularly when
> many active participants can't attend? Wouldn't this be better as a
> planned virtual meeting with an agenda?
>

Well sure it would be better, but are we also barred from taking advantage
of people's proximity for a purely informal conversation?  I was just
proposing giving it a venue, not some sort of official standing.

There won't (and can't) be any formal action items without actually
activating the process, which would take place in all the usual public ways
and with required notice, etc.


> Murray: DBOUND is a concluded WG (of which you were co-chair!). Can a
> concluded WG have an official BoF, or should we just do an informal
> thing?
>

Working groups can be reopened, with or without a BoF, when there's more
work to be done.  Check out RTCWEB, for example.

But for this, given its history, I would put it through a standard
chartering and BoF process, with or without a new name.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email