IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dbound] Informal DBOUND meeting

Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net> Wed, 20 July 2016 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <casey@deccio.net>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430B212B017 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=deccio.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0K-CDqhGKbbq for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA79D12B004 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id x130so58449620vkc.0 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=deccio.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8+x6MsBjTwaYt6em1vQXvsWl6Fe3jbbURUatkrwNpQ8=; b=ed0uvLmWhy6qnsG9c7tNK4cWoSH/WS3gY3bWfIWgRHYrqGDet+pPqyqu3U6UGkwMOy Ra7+/9mybaFBaCRojWjsABaGzYJ97Z3tWGWPlJcdVBUGeK1W8ghMcMlt+9H+u0I+Se6k Cqgu93lYM12TUnSV5Mh1HUHcXxXfiQ0uHL5ME=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=8+x6MsBjTwaYt6em1vQXvsWl6Fe3jbbURUatkrwNpQ8=; b=kYFWuxQ6mrvNYnX32t731RuTSCIRzwIMf7Q+zYk1WGcwG1kkT5WX3tTlmSgVEkuewf 9vxfT4ebiBKl+LCAXN86z38xgVYIFyIHH+WRjEgcVOL4Xe8at0mtewsjVo5+Tj2eIIf/ Mb79wvSM81qlIrNYYYZPHAw+1chYVUQA1FJvVsFZ0Xo+qa5F+tZQL9v9KSl/beB4mQWw u5BS4ZCmbQ8au00jpuYdUo5/nRl7RoNuoqbRWcTTNUV95PAuY4T0mlILtny5CkYd88ct YlzNIjriIDkAq4u6Id92xTLA7TZgtvAAv1NqJZewadeOkYumU8DUcB0oJW44BXrUJpYo Wp9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJsH0CQ8QAkMWloTQz/tpTgJmeOIEpErwSfm6JoBPAAkD8EX8wkSmv2dtmKnzeIhaPNmK6uotaY5Vafug==
X-Received: by 10.176.1.84 with SMTP id 78mr22779220uak.72.1469001184643; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.67.135 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEKtLiRfvf8D9qXnRi2YG8Wp_dBmR=30HW3LHto+DjyEgXZYFg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEKtLiRfvf8D9qXnRi2YG8Wp_dBmR=30HW3LHto+DjyEgXZYFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 03:53:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEKtLiTQfgAVcx202N2mKSpaQqkztbNPByCL12qMpzpaUkWucg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dbound@ietf.org" <dbound@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e4ba2c923d005380c7d9c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/k24xQnWRlTTP3gX3m2wzsSoxvbk>
Subject: Re: [dbound] Informal DBOUND meeting
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:53:08 -0000

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net> wrote:

>
> While the DBOUND WG is not scheduled to meet this week, I'd like to
> propose an unofficial meeting of interested DBOUND parties...  The agenda
> is loose but involves discussion of where we are, where to go, etc.
>

While the ultimate timing might not work for everyone, it appears that a
poll might be more useful than back-and-forths on the mailing list to
assess preferences.  So here it is:

http://doodle.com/poll/cgkv9ypirw8vvig6

If you have interest in the meeting, please participate in the poll.  This
will not only help me nail down a time but also get an idea of how many
might attend.

Thanks,
Casey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email