Re: [dbound] On a path to closing

Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net> Tue, 15 November 2016 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <casey@deccio.net>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7E61295DA for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:37:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=deccio.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NR21pIy3jWb4 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:37:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A96A612946E for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:37:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id c4so26227996pfb.1 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:37:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=deccio.net; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1mUKcuco5fKs3qORib1qlC0M80JB2+02QejemgTirgE=; b=ObusDcLwjSXMMlGpY75lqnv1VjT2KLUm8sLjGITdFTIH/8RrUril91CqqxUbQ04h6+ mmQKZFtXh2hbNIqRppe2dir/cLqPGQA0b4tAYGP+0vfXh6B9Q4O6fYIPgyBUb+e3RCiu ZxrZQZcDlFiDYV/mXNLObzAIm1kDyugWwHLpw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1mUKcuco5fKs3qORib1qlC0M80JB2+02QejemgTirgE=; b=it2jt2DwBhlRPe/WzPiTA3VLq9V/JhbgvaXiACG8Ez8OFiXdL1t6Dl086O6vudDHLA NOOKTgIUv3hGq/2SFkbnJRGc1PdKy3Qw3Q/a9ykeY8iIW+lL2kChV5SXPQVbIkOUDM4E jMFp1cMhWR8LtuwwyZIg5ka96DJe3T01+/GoPj4DfeL4OAWDkLP0TJNvK8cxEHwH+/wy 7p4PiPqtOz1L2NRdUelj2IXzJS2MBInIEU8LPNf/f208vjlrxNUxhPcoKfOe0wXzzviG BMV4hubhBK4KNi6uE7WorYLQSTITinqXAim5x+2R3xGxSWoNGfsjCKFFS6YJ00t90b9j Vgeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfkkdpG5F/u8K2SFPQwHm0oGX7ONb0ijIZEte+6BVKllI/MMmKOMFGfWuKN/DAumQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.19.137 with SMTP id 9mr50251391pft.150.1479245863243; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:37:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.1.221.145] ([204.93.49.152]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 72sm16677429pfw.37.2016.11.15.13.37.42 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:37:42 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net>
In-Reply-To: <20161115125915.GB51667@mx2.yitter.info>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:37:43 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B08A61CB-3DEB-4E0D-932F-DF74DD931136@deccio.net>
References: <20161115125915.GB51667@mx2.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/lmFSMU2dFoUqBGQct-n1eM1zGzk>
Cc: dbound@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dbound] On a path to closing
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:37:45 -0000

> On Nov 15, 2016, at 4:59 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> I spoke with Jeff tonight, and we would like to make a modest proposal
> as a way of closing the WG: that we polish off and publish the problem
> statement, in an effort at least to get something written down about
> what issues there are and what distinctions someone might want to
> make.
> 
> At the same time, we discussed addressing outstanding comments about
> SOPA and publishing it as an experimental RFC somehow (i.e. either ISE
> or AD sponsored).  This ought to be possible: an RRTYPE allocation is
> expert review and I think we have something sufficiently clear as to
> meet the requirements.
> 
> It strikes me that I probably just should have followed that path ages
> agoin order to test whether any of this was viable.  I guess I know
> better for the future.  In the meantime, though, does anyone object to
> pursuing experimental status (assuming we can specify what would
> provide evidence that the experiment worked)?


While I have no particular objection, the same could be asked for the other proposed solutions.  ODUP [1] has proof-of-concept library code [2], which has been tested both in OpenDMARC for experimental use with DMARC and Firefox for experimental use with HTTP cookies.

Casey

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deccio-dbound-organizational-domain-policy-03
[2] https://github.com/verisign/odup