Re: [dbound] The proposals before us

Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com> Sat, 10 September 2016 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BB312B14F for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 08:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yysjeDIaEgdE for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 08:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7008112B015 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 08:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id w193so8619975oiw.2 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 08:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=//HVfo0lWR1BT/ldLa1wUVeEwtQdC3JPAoIUTD8BNIE=; b=Q/cEAarpD/GRdReZfRp3H2NL1BjbONo2GLUjv2vCgTxxMFaDA68hu7MG/yOQey8tdT a/tuh6nNrFvMubCJjO5fztKnWdmt9odYmjIYpQvOTGktRtusOwQBsje6WFzPCBg56LEp BqL6vUyAjCbcFPEPGQ7iu9MDChB4jmuJIUozU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=//HVfo0lWR1BT/ldLa1wUVeEwtQdC3JPAoIUTD8BNIE=; b=U0udCSs4c89J+Kg2Y+Dlregi5IkgwB/QZVkE1/1mdiF9K2Fwekla9kqVP9sxdzlwBL m2tyvgQBXQFFL+NfQWTS1Wh91byEIA7sGzKaBWU7KGlYPxpd9QmcpsUztqxWSO1Gvt+m 8C1UDgZQwR4MeRKwhjSCujm1HEp6lmk09igqSINEWxFuI261ZfXgxk19BgDuagtDeV3q DuX1PRIStE7ABvYEG0QYFjyUMtNehILfyBt1lqIPeMrpv2YdzxGOlO/nf3201XxGvYDC LVDHJzMD4nycd+oPppalBSDjXsHjEbjFg+fBk6LTZpSDbgysG7k9cK9K+ca+cTHOwkJs 2FVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOZ/GWiZ8FalkP4NlQchBZ+Md64derUpbFpn3hlU0vS9xuu/zjsHRHdwxckL0ciGj208r9/c81vyyKL7A==
X-Received: by 10.202.221.194 with SMTP id u185mr12474749oig.99.1473522867601; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 08:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.159.16 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 08:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160909013209.39252.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <CAEKtLiTpa+5URazZeUNwizkx_ohVkgmk_XPZP3gm7k7PrWaY9w@mail.gmail.com> <20160909013209.39252.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 08:54:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1qn4anSncbTCEsAwf0WpkTg08KPmmx1qLpdOxxaCBmK7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d414617a456053c29479d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/raEttdhPWCF_CGUTFHIg3JFtSy4>
Cc: Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net>, "dbound@ietf.org" <dbound@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dbound] The proposals before us
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 15:54:30 -0000

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:32 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

>
> I have more opinions, but before expressing them I'd like to see
> whether anyone other than the two of us is paying attention.
>
>
I am, but have not had time to substantively re-engage with the proposals
before us :-)

--Kurt