Re: [dbound] [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 03 April 2019 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B912412010C for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=6MQBOjhJ; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=DXbCf9Yl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fmTZbdK2tO-A for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C360B120166 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 91600 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2019 17:58:20 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=165cd.5ca4f43c.k1904; bh=CJ5DceGTkrg3/JuZKhQOIl8xArSYrf8l3zcWIfW1OWM=; b=6MQBOjhJBhCgMTAMcrytb4BEpaCcN3aNytxAKOAa3X2CH4VmLKs9vl5uT1rs1SW8IzZUyo0NGAc/3ecRFtUSaboMOT9F2eQTjPRmsnDc+fQ/uBV/+QsrWM99r8OadP37iJtnPfzWCiWIvBOTqSmdtOWl8a+Bp21xN/7EfeaEPObjL0jXEW1msbeUPevHjJegOFi9+ERO1DqtLNcSqgar0Fni+O+3kfg5Gkz15Wj7tAuDZRjf+o0Dwb/nIhO8Gb8f
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=165cd.5ca4f43c.k1904; bh=CJ5DceGTkrg3/JuZKhQOIl8xArSYrf8l3zcWIfW1OWM=; b=DXbCf9YlnSlRZxE3SV+YLhhNt+1xXVZ2kC3k/A1fSlhT9b9vTuvnyXqaay4K9D+nWq9Ngj+kefOehlnGmrPH81iD8Nrs4/hnzciDbCsLj/mpymplsc+xI3ElUzTNrofuGvzPXIQOiJ/7ASDCASGJqiBLLMkrEHRFp1iN6td0Yjf57JhZCS5ani1HF6FMu9mgf5UygaEes98Tgdh8RBpZyKcrq06z+S5AOap2nmjZVASo0r/2VRM0OTRD0qld92L9
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 03 Apr 2019 17:58:20 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8391420115F376; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:58:19 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 3 Apr 2019 13:58:19 -0400
Message-Id: <20190403175820.8391420115F376@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net, dbound@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <3bebe973-0536-96cd-983e-240ba43463c4@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/tdWz2SnVMs3h94ZQGmnpK872AUs>
Subject: Re: [dbound] [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:58:24 -0000

In article <3bebe973-0536-96cd-983e-240ba43463c4@dcrocker.net>; you write:
>Comments eagerly sought, of course.

This seems sorta kinda like my dbound draft, only with _tagged TXT
records rather than a new rrtype, and (unless I missed something) a
hope that somehow you can use a yet to be invented cache to avoid
walking up the tree, where mine used wildcards to do one lookup per
boundary regardless of the tree depth.

I can see that the tradeoffs are different but I don't see why they're better.

R's,
John

>A new version of I-D, draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt
>has been successfully submitted by D. Crocker and posted to the
>IETF repository.
>
>Name:		draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter
>Revision:	00
>Title:		DNS Perimeter Overlay
>Document date:	2019-04-02
>Group:		Individual Submission
>Pages:		20
>URL: 
>https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt