IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dbound] DBOUND interest @ IETF 114?

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 28 July 2022 11:52 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3D7C183574 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 04:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id feXx-M3iugWM for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 04:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97E44C183573 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 04:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.47.60.230] ([216.127.113.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 26SBobrO075490 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 04:50:39 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host [216.127.113.55] claimed to be [10.47.60.230]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: dbound@ietf.org
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:52:33 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5798)
Message-ID: <81C5E85B-9E6B-4AB8-97C3-273F53339B41@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaaNd-0=psHz8qp27EEF2xZmTuWRmMVTgnsRKJnHZmbcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1658868935831.47380@amazon.com> <CAL0qLwaciDeTxem_X-iUeTSoVSttEYORUqFhx72zymGDe9jEWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwaaNd-0=psHz8qp27EEF2xZmTuWRmMVTgnsRKJnHZmbcA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/wywEHYvLfypFX3b-lW8pmrG_Y2U>
Subject: Re: [dbound] DBOUND interest @ IETF 114?
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 11:52:39 -0000

What is the purpose of meeting f2f on short notice, particularly when 
many active participants can't attend? Wouldn't this be better as a 
planned virtual meeting with an agenda?

Murray: DBOUND is a concluded WG (of which you were co-chair!). Can a 
concluded WG have an official BoF, or should we just do an informal 
thing?

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email