Re: [dc] draft-khasnabish-vmmi-problems-00.txt

Thanks Juergen.

Can you give a few examples of which "implementors"
you are referring to.

Best.

Bhumip

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 04:06:19PM -0800, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:
> > Greetings Vishwas,
> >
> >       And I guess I am saying that I'm not sure I agree.  If a single
> process running can kill all the other processes on a given system
> (especially if it is in "user space" - which I would assume for control
> plane functions), I would say that there are more substantial issues with
> the architecture of that particular VM distribution.  Similar answer if
> someone actually put a control-plane engine (think routing protocols) in
> kernel space.  We, as a standards organization can't save the world from
> less-than-inteligent developers....
> >
>
> The Linux-based hypervisors I have used happen to have the bridge(s)
> in the kernel plus user space utilities to configure/control them, as
> it should be. But then I am not using products but just open source
> implementations... ;-)
>
> A general observation: I think what this discussion really is lacking
> is implementors familiar with real-world implementations. If there
> were more implementors involved here with a decent understanding of
> code bases, I assume we would be quickly able to figure out what and
> if anything needs to be dealt with in the IETF.
>
> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>  _______________________________________________
> dc mailing list
> dc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dc
>