IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Dclc] Tech report of possible interest

Toby Moncaster <toby.moncaster@cl.cam.ac.uk> Fri, 25 July 2014 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tm444@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6662C1A0299 for <dclc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 06:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74vsJEp6c7mW for <dclc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 06:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-40-v6.csi.cam.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:212:8::e:f40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 331F11B28DA for <dclc@irtf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 06:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from ravage.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.1.17]:60484) by ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:tm444) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1XAg1N-0004my-mN (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) for dclc@irtf.org (return-path <tm444@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:58:54 +0100
From: Toby Moncaster <toby.moncaster@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CFA509F7-03DE-4E75-AD14-973FF725876B"
Message-Id: <765E6782-13E7-4E0E-8035-01D3A6AC6B1E@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:58:50 +0100
To: dclc <dclc@irtf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Sender: "T. Moncaster" <tm444@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dclc/BY48jj_UGetwUTsVRlkpQFEVNQ8
Subject: [Dclc] Tech report of possible interest
X-BeenThere: dclc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Data Center Latency Control <dclc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dclc>, <mailto:dclc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dclc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dclc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dclc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dclc>, <mailto:dclc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:58:59 -0000

HI all,

the following tech report (which is currently seeking a publication venue) includes some decent measurements of the additional latency due to virtualisation.

http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/201418/tr-silo-sep13.pdf 

Toby

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email