IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dclc] Status of the group

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 26 May 2015 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57DC1B2C91 for <dclc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 759Re5MFfTtx for <dclc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 11:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E0091ACD5D for <dclc@irtf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 11:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1636; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432663420; x=1433873020; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=JWgRW/RydQC4r4dhOR9PhfME9LMWshtBU/JBvoTLG4I=; b=C/PQLrAd/otKN/8QlJO9hvGtDvfqzrQtIyzs1aLCkzQ4ge+t07UFVHuB d48gbbOcD3sU2A57ADuD4uBzwZZLgtDuTKH6XyRJ1fEGDAXUU69Kpcpip WXEAFRY8Amh/8DrZfOy16PIQBPeZR8vrPLT8rBY7fHjdTis/ljI2/zKNY 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ANBQA2tWRV/40NJK1cgxCBMgbKfQKBR0wBAQEBAQGBC4QiAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgYLjIlAgQOBQ6IFgjUAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLOoUFB4MXgRYFkwiCEoFDhzqXLyODeG+BRoEBAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,500,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="422807361"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2015 18:03:39 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4QI3cex004114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 May 2015 18:03:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.134]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 26 May 2015 13:03:38 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Thread-Topic: [Dclc] Status of the group
Thread-Index: AQHQl95KlQ/tFCDuxESzQlOHPKjbow==
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:03:37 +0000
Message-ID: <25089274-843E-41D8-B486-E0900FC52A7F@cisco.com>
References: <D25735B9-0346-43B9-9E86-BCE162DC9572@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <D25735B9-0346-43B9-9E86-BCE162DC9572@netapp.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.24.163.30]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C5334AE1-9EE7-47EA-B72C-4C530FFBE720"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dclc/l27GfYgWBlAeSZKvm9rtNsoRQD8>
Cc: dclc <dclc@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dclc] Status of the group
X-BeenThere: dclc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Data Center Latency Control <dclc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dclc>, <mailto:dclc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dclc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dclc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dclc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dclc>, <mailto:dclc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:04:04 -0000

> On May 26, 2015, at 4:37 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> wrote:
> 
> there hasn't been any activity in this group in the last six months. I'm wondering if we should let it fizzle out? Or is someone feeling sufficiently motivated to take the flag from Fred and Lingli, put the energy in and make this happen?

For the record, I have not asked for a meeting room in Prague, although I imagine we can get a side room for the price of asking. That is on the basis of how hard it has been to get people to talk about what they are doing. Happy to revive the work, or to see it revived by someone else, but I need people to step up.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email