Re: [dcon] DCON BOF preliminary agenda

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Mon, 07 November 2011 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: dcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C3F11E808E for <dcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:02:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.197, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16gvTsQHIqdM for <dcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:02:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6FF11E808B for <dcon@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:02:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.98]) by qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id uHx71h00427AodY54J2S2x; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:02:26 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([24.62.229.5]) by omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id uJ2R1h01207duvL3fJ2RT8; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:02:26 +0000
Message-ID: <4EB81D2F.5020800@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:02:23 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcon@ietf.org
References: <4EB17784.9090906@unina.it> <4EB7E9A3.4010102@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EB7E9A3.4010102@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dcon] DCON BOF preliminary agenda
X-BeenThere: dcon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Conferencing BOF discussion list <dcon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcon>, <mailto:dcon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dcon>
List-Post: <mailto:dcon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcon>, <mailto:dcon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:02:26 -0000

On 11/7/11 9:22 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the IETF is getting closer. Now it would be a good time to start
> discussions on any issue that may not be clear enough in the proposed
> charter.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dcon/current/msg00002.html

I find one gaping hole in the charter:

*Why* is this work being undertaken?
What advantages are expected from this compared to using basic xcon?

	Thanks,
	Paul