[dcp] Re: DCP charter.....
Sally Floyd <floyd@aciri.org> Wed, 05 December 2001 01:08 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged))
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA20289
for <dcp-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:08:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA13735;
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:08:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176])
by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA13709
for <dcp@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:07:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from elk.aciri.org (elk.aciri.org [192.150.187.21])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA20286
for <dcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:07:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from elk.aciri.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by elk.aciri.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fB518Mr75964;
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:08:22 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from floyd@elk.aciri.org)
Message-Id: <200112050108.fB518Mr75964@elk.aciri.org>
To: "Mike O'Dell" <mo@ccr.org>
cc: tsv@newdev.harvard.edu, dcp@ietf.org
From: Sally Floyd <floyd@aciri.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 17:08:22 -0800
Subject: [dcp] Re: DCP charter.....
Sender: dcp-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dcp-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Datagram Control Protocol <dcp.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dcp@ietf.org
>so is there a draft protocol to review at the BOF? >or at least a sketch of a protocol? Yep, you could look at the DCP web page at: http://www.aciri.org/kohler/dcp/ and at the four internet drafts on that page. >or is this seeking permission to create a design WG?? > >if it is the last item, "Just Say No." > >i suggest a design WG cannot be chartered for this >effort because by the time it finishes, it will >not be in line with its charter, ie, simple, clean, >etc. need i point to PPP as the object lesson?? Yep, we agree. The proposed charter says the following: Drafts for DCP, and several associated congestion control IDs, already exist. The first task before the working group will be an abbreviated functional requirement validation of those drafts. There are two possible outcomes: (1) The current DCP draft is declared suitable for further work, with some areas listed for possible extension. (2) The current DCP draft is declared unsuitable for further work, and more formal functional requirement exploration begins. The authors of the DCP documents hope that the outcome of the BOF will be to approve the general design of DCP, as discussed in "draft-kohler-dcp-01.txt", to have some interesting discussions about specific requirements in terms of mobility and security, and to get on with the work. We shall see. I am cc-ing this to the DCP mailing list, where the discussion should continue... - Sally _______________________________________________ dcp mailing list dcp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcp
- [dcp] Re: DCP charter..... Sally Floyd
- [dcp] Re: DCP charter..... Mike O'Dell
- [dcp] Re: DCP charter..... Bernard Aboba