Re: [dcp] draft dccp agenda

Aaron Falk <falk@isi.edu> Tue, 25 June 2002 22:19 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA01487 for <dcp-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:19:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id SAA22088 for dcp-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:20:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA22080; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:20:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA22040 for <dcp@ns.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:20:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nit.isi.edu (nit.isi.edu [128.9.160.116]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA01475 for <dcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:19:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nit.isi.edu (nit.isi.edu [128.9.160.116]) by nit.isi.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5PMJgo31595; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:19:42 -0700
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:19:42 -0700
From: Aaron Falk <falk@isi.edu>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@era.ericsson.se>
cc: dcp@ietf.org, Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu>, Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, Eddie Kohler <kohler@icir.org>
Subject: Re: [dcp] draft dccp agenda
Message-ID: <20960000.1025043582@nit.isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3D181B33.7030004@era.ericsson.se>
References: <6550000.1024938581@nit.isi.edu> <3D181B33.7030004@era.ericsson.se>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dcp-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dcp-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Datagram Control Protocol <dcp.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dcp@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Magnus-

The document draft-floyd-dcp-problem-00.txt has been submitted as an 
informal requirements summary.  This document has been out since February 
and there has been very little, if any, discussion about changes to 
requirements.  It's not a good use of valuable working group time to review 
a doc that's been out for a while.  If you have some issues with the 
problem statement, let's surface them on the mail list first.

--aaron


--On Tuesday, June 25, 2002 09:26:43 AM +0200 Magnus Westerlund 
<magnus.westerlund@era.ericsson.se> wrote:

> Hi Aaron,
>
> Shouldn't there be some time for discussing requirements on DCCP? I would
> also like to see a presentation from Kohler about what requirements they
> have seen and address by the current proposal.
>
> Regards
>
> Magnus


_______________________________________________
dcp mailing list: dcp@ietf.org
archives: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcp
project: http://www.icir.org/kohler/dcp/