IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcpel] DCPEL BoF support

Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> Fri, 03 March 2006 14:46 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FFBXv-0007h1-47; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 09:46:19 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FFBXt-0007fC-Hk for dcpel@ietf.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 09:46:17 -0500
Received: from tla.crepundia.net ([194.71.127.149] helo=report.tla-group.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FFBXs-0007yu-3j for dcpel@ietf.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 09:46:17 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (report.tla-group.com [194.71.127.149]) by report.tla-group.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id k23E5vHC010998; Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:05:57 +0100
In-Reply-To: <43FF0D8F.1020800@rd.francetelecom.com>
References: <43FF0D8F.1020800@rd.francetelecom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <B2717D66-E214-4AF9-842B-F4BD60DD17B9@acm.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [Dcpel] DCPEL BoF support
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:46:11 +0100
To: Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: dcpel@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dcpel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for possible diffserv control plane elements WG <dcpel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcpel>, <mailto:dcpel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dcpel>
List-Post: <mailto:dcpel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcpel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcpel>, <mailto:dcpel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dcpel-bounces@ietf.org

On 24 feb 2006, at 14.43, Olivier Dugeon wrote:


> We are in favor of a such BoF.


is there going to be a BoF?  I don't see one on the current draft  
schedule.  I know it is too late, but i think having a BoF would be a  
good thing, even if it ends up an informal affair at this point.

a.


_______________________________________________
Dcpel mailing list
Dcpel@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcpel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email