Re: AW: [Dcpel] FWD: [Re: proposed charter]
Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com> Thu, 09 March 2006 15:56 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHNVC-0003lT-Nw; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:56:34 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHNVB-0003lO-Mx for dcpel@ietf.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:56:33 -0500
Received: from outbound.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.171]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHNVA-0006MA-Gr for dcpel@ietf.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:56:33 -0500
Received: from 72-254-36-225.client.stsn.net ([72.254.36.225] helo=[192.168.1.102]) by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.51) id 1FHNVA-000GMd-0q; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:56:32 -0500
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Originating-IP: 72.254.36.225
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: kmnichols
Message-ID: <4410502C.3070002@pollere.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:56:28 -0800
From: Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (Macintosh/20051006)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Tschofenig, Hannes" <hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com>, dcpel@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AW: [Dcpel] FWD: [Re: proposed charter]
References: <ECDC9C7BC7809340842C0E7FCF48C393A807B3@MCHP7IEA.ww002.siemens.net>
In-Reply-To: <ECDC9C7BC7809340842C0E7FCF48C393A807B3@MCHP7IEA.ww002.siemens.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc:
X-BeenThere: dcpel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for possible diffserv control plane elements WG <dcpel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcpel>, <mailto:dcpel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/dcpel>
List-Post: <mailto:dcpel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcpel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcpel>, <mailto:dcpel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dcpel-bounces@ietf.org
So, I really must reply, in brief, to Hannes's email. It seems to be all about signaling. In my opinion, this has been a big problem in the QoS area in general and particularly at the IETF. That is, spending time talking about what information is going to be sent around and in what sort of containers rather than how to manage and control IP differentiated services. If the right information is being sent, then a useful control and management structure should be able to use it. But it seems like we need to have an infrastructure that is capable of realizing services on an IP network before we worry overly much about what is being sent. Particularly since signaling is not required for all services. Kathie _______________________________________________ Dcpel mailing list Dcpel@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcpel
- AW: [Dcpel] FWD: [Re: proposed charter] Tschofenig, Hannes
- Re: AW: [Dcpel] FWD: [Re: proposed charter] Kathleen Nichols
- Re: AW: [Dcpel] FWD: [Re: proposed charter] James M. Polk
- Re: AW: [Dcpel] FWD: [Re: proposed charter] Olivier Dugeon
- Re: AW: [Dcpel] FWD: [Re: proposed charter] Paulo Mendes
- RE: AW: [Dcpel] FWD: [Re: proposed charter] Hancock, Robert