IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrouting] [Lsvr] A comment on draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 03 January 2018 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: dcrouting@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrouting@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42411267BB; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 07:07:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ok-TeSqApjzF; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 07:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A07D81205D3; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 07:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A4C8E14EF; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 07:07:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1514992045; bh=B7QCj46zTIUr2D6Xz5rQjBEap1wz1GUGD9ABRcoSR88=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Mcn6k+2qMR5BKoc8+P4jo0CHuptWeU8c7ZYIwBFUyNLb719GDSeYz8GjMNcSB9+gD 1xbRXr/5wB/CkYU5ayBP2boW0AhrkCMOXPkRQ0JaReyXF6opqS6wbLrQ3rLI5vjqrY BFBDSv1JW4ygRPStE2sIxfvhiHDeCVfZ+Lj/dhDU=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maila2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [50.225.209.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4008B8E12E6; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 07:07:23 -0800 (PST)
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>
Cc: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>, "dcrouting@ietf.org" <dcrouting@ietf.org>, "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <0DB89F21-8E32-46A7-A2B7-B79977948455@arrcus.com> <m2373nocer.wl-randy@psg.com> <D6723964.E82B2%acee@cisco.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <dd81cd67-4aa8-c322-d447-532943abbe89@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 10:07:22 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D6723964.E82B2%acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrouting/KnIzNlnUABlKHZRH0XdQwRwu6Jc>
Subject: Re: [Dcrouting] [Lsvr] A comment on draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf
X-BeenThere: dcrouting@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Routing in the Data Center: discussions about problems, requirements and potential solutions." <dcrouting.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrouting>, <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrouting/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrouting@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrouting>, <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 15:07:28 -0000

It seems to me that having two different BGP decision processes 
available is going to have significant impact on achieving consistency 
so taht routing actually converges. I suspect it willnot take much to 
define what choices are stable and effective.

Leaving out any comments on how to make this (coexistence) work seems a 
mistake.

Yours,
Joel

On 1/3/18 7:40 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Agreed. Thanks Randy!
> 
> Plan to refresh the draft this week.
> 
> Acee
> 
> On 1/2/18, 10:21 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Furthermore, we could chose to consider such an interaction as a
>>> matter of local policy (implementation specific).
>>
>> pedantry: s/implementation/configuration/.  i.e. op chooses, not vendor.
>>
>> randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dcrouting mailing list
> Dcrouting@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrouting
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email