IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] Hashed Key Records in draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-02

denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 23 June 2017 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602661200F3 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1t0LkTgvVInu for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9471B1287A7 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 63so20387245ywr.0 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=B5HgLgJZYmV8QWz1gVmRp50KkYPcYQztHP4K80yQ+3I=; b=kBb9Y+JhSugkJq48zi4/J2dvEMw5a758+ZSWwSwGhezJhZxKkWriRQEQ1i0yimDuJH BokNcSpo/xV0ePLY9lUZMClznbfUyz2OZGd33OAXSJVPKjlkbhNJQCehsrNi6YrXlpZT MYzeAsfWsT6YfvWKJTzxxmUzyazfbkCo5/KMRZ+BlsUOZeX54pM0i8vLiGQ50R7R39rx TJ5WhVq3Z3VQuhusPhbk+1QquJK5/OmoWJgoDSX3mTbcbDDJZJBXQM4QYeIkTzIG8A/r V2vF1BSOmxGwqHydc5JBmOWha5PlhIlqPp9HtBMrFeAkJYUCzqKPSQm+VMOtCzb7JMqs sdyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=B5HgLgJZYmV8QWz1gVmRp50KkYPcYQztHP4K80yQ+3I=; b=alQFeJF1rOjlDY8YBj9w5vrnuU0lUJKto0Vr8vAzqwNRZ7QHgeneF7flEfntXbyiUx w3WmmrFGaE3XxCIug9fF4By0OzoGLKdjDSOdy4yo+Qd81FYfspcdxxH9Kxs6Lwpnu5+I ayGX+Pg3ft/hnjIjQQzaA7f8cOy/6H0bTxjodglILPRN5gwwqhZ0rO3Nnk2re20t1IcV hqqod7sY6V9s2cui+76dFbtWHYKi81GEeMr3K0aS/YqyC86mw6Y5NO4RQnQVj9P/PXUA BJUPnjgYG0tmCF6Xeb4W6Psv73Q9dmj+fJ4nrlkUwmj7oF52sjkjyQeq63j2tzRJmNj6 +zOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzyN+ooSdcDHJ0LTpZFcHIPhz8P8h1fYa8tBi7vSiSXJIXIG34/ 3awL2RByYBIOvca++0K1wUi0bRykTQ==
X-Received: by 10.13.231.7 with SMTP id q7mr6910598ywe.8.1498244629796; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.174.65 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170623174153.31788.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <CADPMZDD+1vG8=sMEPz=-+wwRLSWJTjAV5pLyxsURU5xZH6WKhw@mail.gmail.com> <20170623174153.31788.qmail@ary.lan>
From: denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:03:49 -0600
Message-ID: <CADPMZDAYrC+7RpxUDU-E=zgCAjzY-riGv6LAXhGYHJ-Ej4i55Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0805a4f21e0b0552a542e1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/0KZQKrgnEYs5kXnZRHSp4brKbe0>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] Hashed Key Records in draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-02
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:03:52 -0000

Certainly, did not mean to suggest that one was not fit for purpose. I was
responding specifically with respect to "one fingerprint everywhere". That
seems like a good idea to me, if only we could gather interest from
implementers of multiple protocols to adopt in the future. It would not
work as a DKIM-specific endeavor.

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:41 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <CADPMZDD+1vG8=sMEPz=-+wwRLSWJTjAV5pLyxsURU5xZH6WKhw@mail.
> gmail.com> you write:
> >I propose that the best fingerprint encoding designed so far is the
> >Bubble-Babble encoding by Antti Huima. ....
>
> No doubt, but we're talking about the one in
> draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-02, in which I tried to make the minimum
> perturbation to existing DKIM implementations.
>
> If you're aware of reasons why that one can't be implemented, or has
> horribly security problems, or otherwise won't interoperate, now's the
> time to tell us about it.
>
> R's,
> John
>

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status