IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] Review of draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-03

Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net> Fri, 07 July 2017 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EFE131749 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bluepopcorn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f0WOWUnPE32f for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from v2.bluepopcorn.net (v2.bluepopcorn.net [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a994::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BB48131747 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2605:e000:d482:d500:70ca:f47f:a93f:e0a8] ([IPv6:2605:e000:d482:d500:70ca:f47f:a93f:e0a8]) (authenticated bits=0) by v2.bluepopcorn.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v67HIOjr028297 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:18:26 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bluepopcorn.net; s=supersize; t=1499447906; bh=AENQnkllEdCNtSoB68Duzt1XbYwYw0Vk5YEqhvUTF2o=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=as/NsMjWPgGMkiCBE831opfYr6EVtYQUlYM0jXD694AetiNEgz0W3J8g/ScNrPBpq xYva/iemuN0YSBkWONyd8mXgTPG/lZ53hrChsiNHdDRleLh7TmopIctVIpgcICkaKS jFtZGttvXAL2yNOvXyZeQwWDi14ViRt7PEuSDj0E=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (14F89)
In-Reply-To: <564f297f17424f34b4ba1e118ab6f62c@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 07:18:18 -1000
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "dcrup@ietf.org" <dcrup@ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D4D564D0-73C6-45CA-9962-33106229DE02@bluepopcorn.net>
References: <CABkgnnW8nnoRGKoJQ4STAcT6CXdWFRCpz0h20hw+ksfw1x0PGg@mail.gmail.com> <6d4b76c9b42848f1b18c42ba22895993@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CABcZeBM-qh+iW_+Br2URpdjHsLZ_L1xqZWUVirW-8-E7k4cvzg@mail.gmail.com> <564f297f17424f34b4ba1e118ab6f62c@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/86uqFNOoNdn16lgOkHaLA3frUqI>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] Review of draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-03
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 17:18:36 -0000


On Jul 7, 2017, at 5:37 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

>>> I disagree, and so far the WG seems to be leaning against this view.  We'll talk in Prague, of course, but right now the only voices for hashing are you and ekr.
> 
>> Also Jim Fenton, I believe.
> 
> Oops, you are correct.  Thanks.

Confirming, I favor hashing.

-Jim

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status