Re: [Dcrup] I-D draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-06

[Scott Kitterman <[e-mail]>]

On Wednesday, September 13, 2017 01:41:13 PM John R Levine wrote:
> I have sent in a new draft which is intended to take into account all of
> the comments I've seen.  There aren't any changes to bits on the wire,
> just editorial ones.
> 
> As far as I can tell, this is about as done as it's going to get.

Do we really need to add both rsafp and ed25519?

I thought we had ~agreed (or at least discussed) earlier to only add ed25519 
since these new methods only work if widely deployed by both signers and 
verifiers and adding two new methods makes it less likely that either will 
achieve critical mass.

Scott K