IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] Draft agenda for DCRUP at IETF

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 10 July 2017 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136F81275AB for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fL9GJQt7VdK for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01C1126B72 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v6A7bSwV023905; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:37:56 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=g//4f+qZfABBFsVP6/KsPi1ZHacmbW3TyBdx7Gc9jDA=; b=mwj+M3rxMqBJ8MLBYaAgj8ZibQumtTxS992J3AuJ6zTfz1odOxTcyeYrzYFuSBnkb6bT DV3R8zf9au6mDQhQca0epwl//x8FRzxTd3W6bpRXEcmfS7h8CiRv6JOiksruZpSdhgeh rutBxYtk5LWD3uDnm+GVQ3dlNVhCNhoSi47mG4CZKb6HGqOwduckIWLdBGjI9kjuOCIj S6wEV3O57J/itr8FORknj8Oo9VMGbztxNpr02HwgKOdMHTKjfyHZeqIfNJ4mmCY0Cr5r qkViVGYULmsQvdNs/O6J9jHGF7CLustvmgBJR5MuMla4PSiwNRy2AGlktrIvgleidP/m zg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (a184-51-33-19.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2bjtp3evkp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:37:55 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v6A7aIYh019244; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 03:37:54 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2bjtqu3p66-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 03:37:54 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 03:37:53 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 03:37:53 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, "dcrup@ietf.org" <dcrup@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dcrup] Draft agenda for DCRUP at IETF
Thread-Index: AdL2cmBUfpDyr5qUTfWga+NmtT/8OQC5zdkAAAKMhcA=
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:37:53 +0000
Message-ID: <ee879afffe814fe9a8b693a51824e1e7@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <d7887abb5729470aa17a918a4dabd789@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <2111048.dxWtyJcX9G@kitterma-e6430>
In-Reply-To: <2111048.dxWtyJcX9G@kitterma-e6430>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.152.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-07-10_03:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1707100136
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-07-10_03:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1707100137
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/G0pqfgl45_VK1ptSda8G0ncEitw>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] Draft agenda for DCRUP at IETF
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:37:59 -0000

> My sense over the last few days is that we aren't getting anywhere close to
> consensus that would make it reasonable to believe the other arguments will
> be wrapped up in short order and we ought to go ahead with my draft, but
> that's just one person's view.

And on co-chair's :)

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status