IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-03.txt

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sun, 02 July 2017 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF0B129AAD for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mlw5-tzAeTvL for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 13:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x229.google.com (mail-yw0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D666128B8F for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 13:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x229.google.com with SMTP id l21so56263087ywb.1 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 13:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pcFypomPLWggrCozqndvG6Fzm96nlPdvKYRBEIGcZUg=; b=bmNP2XEeSJbaL+6PbxuT+QjYkVjth07iQ2UMT5Ez6toatFeBu7mfObDvrwWATiAJGm +e0kJGSEkJVqPKrOgCsL7Ft1kR6tzZgnQE7qYk+HdX/w0B4Ub4mXS5FgDdHA7oMIIsdA 6np768SqaQF/M7AEO75vR15lAXRfvJmCs6MYIbnG/FmBcnYUhExCFnScX0Nw5S1BcG09 b64ufgxHm6xfRCq/j2boCkMVVrrrQkb2kkpplqaGR86r0IfppRHJ9nbK8ldPbp61yw/H 3r2xZDfiaXf+nNbNwpCzrgUeaSssE1FYczjy0gEDEzgIHEN+8MZnXVKim0qW/V2U50Ml 1Hvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pcFypomPLWggrCozqndvG6Fzm96nlPdvKYRBEIGcZUg=; b=Wk1CRN2UPps7q06iLuNlybEWlaKhKCaR2bvWhheJNWmFif++8FWorPQO5t3jYlWlBO 13ys84vo7md2O864NZ/wEL74ULlW+mVlY6UXyp7rl47bC3LQtQGjAlv4A4/plcwuxRad E4316ozFS8mwLVHycYanYc0MIG9LeUm2mgQ7PHubpl4Kt8UJuf9vDNL+bbESSHsSMCGd 1O7e9lC7nEt3i4NclwcgqPHKSPsKz0uMWkQkrCDqBrQFnjqtA7KxpAWgPyIpZDiEHGI1 6trUb1kE7tAuONaZCcmZeG1h0fqq8Eg4059Ko2cV/nIDuuj2hnvQ/sFtFW95uanCNc/c H+0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwmqtuUZ0awtzBmgZBPRCPSWARA2xXyUcMTb2ViY+mSbyVmhPRd ZOGEyLS2I3+Sd93kZY7DJVEVoNugOuGzunI=
X-Received: by 10.129.50.140 with SMTP id y134mr24300538ywy.312.1499029121647; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 13:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.215.9 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707021544590.72907@ary.qy>
References: <CABcZeBOs1yZ7q3oBgNeVkw=zSQb_SuS4hqK8BH0ebrD5LRYTFg@mail.gmail.com> <20170702025650.55902.qmail@ary.lan> <CABcZeBM4KEr5CEZq4t9BX50btCRPLhZBAtZN18v_6gZ5B-ni5A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707012341180.70305@ary.qy> <CABcZeBOLSrYo8mEQ1evyU7CzctV0VF4r7_bX3nA0oxtHCeEgSQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707021544590.72907@ary.qy>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 13:58:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPbL9EgZhF9t6j1Nt9xU=97oNj1ssaVFaiS8Mgd573evA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140932a4dd6c405535beac7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/PjlkCKIYeTi2sCwH6ajpPHEdNWo>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 20:58:44 -0000

On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 12:53 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> Given that (a) we already have algorithms that are bigger and (b)
>> post-quantum keys might be quite a bit bigger, it seems unwise to design
>> under the assumption that it will not happen.
>>
>
> Well, OK, but concretely, what do you want us to do now?
>

I thought I made that clear: I think the default representation should be
hashed, not unhashed.


Right now, today, I don't see that hasned ed25519 keys solve any problem,
> so I'm not going to include them unless there is something I don't
> understand that they can do that plain ed25519 keys in the key records
> don't.
>

Uh, the way this works isn't that the editor decides what happens and
everyone needs to persuade him. Rather, the draft needs to represent
consensus of the WG. Happy to talk about this in Prague, of course.

-Ekr


>
> R's,
> John
>
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status