Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-ecc-00.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 02 June 2017 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79680120727 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JA_LWKYSAHw2 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74223129537 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9971D300563 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:53:31 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id r0feFX2SQQyM for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:53:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5261300429; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:53:29 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <2D2E54E1-23A0-4470-85AD-F861770B10B1@nist.gov>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 10:53:29 -0400
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <885BDE45-DFB7-4BC5-8C98-C5D40C82DAE3@vigilsec.com>
References: <149641449629.31859.14544571541039601302@ietfa.amsl.com> <2D2E54E1-23A0-4470-85AD-F861770B10B1@nist.gov>
To: "Rose, Scott" <scott.rose@nist.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/WMx5o-DyuWDGrbBlOeQAa5gtKsY>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-ecc-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:53:34 -0000

Scott:

Since ECDSA P-256 and SHA-256 have the same security strength, what is the reason for adding SHA-512 at this time?  I do not see anything in the Introduction or Security Considerations to answer that question.

Russ



> On Jun 2, 2017, at 10:46 AM, Rose, Scott <scott.rose@nist.gov> wrote:
> 
> Updated to reflect WG status.  Also made the following changes:
> 
> 1. Reduced new algorithms list to just one (ECDSA P=256).
> 
> 2. Included revised definition of key:value pairs for DKIM keys and signatures.  One thing I thought about: should the “k=“ in keys to be mandatory now that RSA isn’t the only algorithm?  Or leave the default as is, so that anyone using ECDSA must use the “k=“ tag to signal its use?
> 
> 3. Just noticed that the format is mess up for the ABNF notation - dang.  Will fix that.
> 
> Scott
> 
> On 2 Jun 2017, at 10:41, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the DKIM Crypto Update of the IETF.
>> 
>>        Title           : Defining Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms for use with DKIM
>>        Author          : Scott Rose
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-ecc-00.txt
>> 	Pages           : 7
>> 	Date            : 2017-06-02
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>   DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) uses digital signature to associate
>>   a message with a given sending domain.  Currently, there is only one
>>   cryptography algorithm defined for use with DKIM (RSA).  This
>>   document defines four new elliptic curve cryptography algorithms for
>>   use with DKIM.  This will allow for algorithm agility if a weakness
>>   is found in RSA, and allows for smaller key length to provide the
>>   same digital signature strength.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-ecc/
>> 
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-ecc-00
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-ecc-00
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dcrup mailing list
>> Dcrup@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup
> 
> 
> ===================================
> Scott Rose
> NIST ITL
> scott.rose@nist.gov
> +1-301-975-8439
> GV: +1-571-249-3671
> ===================================
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dcrup mailing list
> Dcrup@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup