Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and document shepherds

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 10 June 2017 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558631270AC for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EZckFny8vZ4Z for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C4091267BB for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v5AJgTFv025715; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 20:45:12 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=PsGpViXkrBtNsnpWEugQyiT+89D/SU47efm+ZMQIleE=; b=aUNgimc+IKUc5e3N3p0++T7UUXiVD6luUY4PfhLc2DwbbkaPTZkdkGH4/bNgj9jXrAbg JIgBhjfaY0crSL1j/vC51CVhUhQW7IcfSwITMKvgdh2Z+H1qZMq0sWNnt5fUQ+lkrCHb A1w15rH5YsryO5axA6pOTPK1cXJ55lVMWG3hWneSCqRyHVU6yPdcOIw3hC/MXZdIhnQQ D7y3YQsyq8oIeCcjXnthn9sogXPI+PIEz0p4Qk+wYYw2dC6nRKidgdguN1pH/KG8UY8N VyYQnbm5LApZMOkGtCrHaY5YxYBq/me4i0pJSoDiuCFHs0dXKo9bixvcxq4y4ozFoauD FA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (a184-51-33-19.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2b096b2tas-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 10 Jun 2017 20:45:12 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v5AJekna012648; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 15:45:11 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2b0c3u1bb5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 10 Jun 2017 15:45:11 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 15:45:10 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 15:45:10 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "dcrup@ietf.org" <dcrup@ietf.org>
CC: "sklist@kitterman.com" <sklist@kitterman.com>
Thread-Topic: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and document shepherds
Thread-Index: AQHS4e9v76FDRZ1/SkmxsKHlHcgK+6IeoaAAgAAeA4D//74GsA==
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:45:09 +0000
Message-ID: <006b65316e4640b09ef9e08350048695@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <33024B2C-DBF1-44DC-A18E-973D4C8ACD12@kitterman.com> <20170610193159.15077.qmail@ary.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20170610193159.15077.qmail@ary.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.39.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-06-10_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1706100336
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-06-10_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1706100336
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/XSvwfd99s1AjGHff9MjqvF4wrpo>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and document shepherds
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:45:16 -0000

> >I think you are substantially underestimating the time it will take to
> >get IETF consensus on a new approach based on ECC.  I think if it's done in a
> year, that'll be fast.
> 
> I sure hope you're wrong.

CFRG already spent all the time working to get consensus on algorithms.  We should be able to have a WGLC-ready document in a couple of months, if we can get a direction and writer(s) by Prague.