IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] FW: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 14 August 2017 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A54A12009C for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 19:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pdX9QWYUqcY0 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 19:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x232.google.com (mail-it0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE9CE1200F3 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 19:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 77so15875345itj.1 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 19:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=u9NvrRkLgHMHg62CNeAkO5QdcTK/q1NLqdT5+/Rwvlg=; b=uP1S4V+XY1tRx6z/GcB82/pluhWtbYmzc08mwOuNIlaoo17j4daCbhpOXVu0Jczwoi F8AgPM2kD9f3+Ud7E1ZIUDf099eAbb9ZGHNOKFpcXpJ655us7Bhmz9hfPOqMvD1G7erb a2FSpDPC1Vlp/UCW2MGOClEQdnRyKC4wK3MoasxxqNyIky8X9ZuqlRAk+2isWq2TO6fi CsZYme7q0oSQs15ELyoCpDDd2YkGxpOv7N80CafEKsuMedGDhuzkSh1aS0mnZJFc4lhu t7XA5Ff5KQgBbd2iA8ZwhzYJYVjri3EG2Cbt8+OTa1OOt6Tw+pfUrbYbwHhAITJzZRyX jKVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u9NvrRkLgHMHg62CNeAkO5QdcTK/q1NLqdT5+/Rwvlg=; b=qMNMqEY+zO84nrXS9XlvmuuHZwUOqPFTqJXQ683Sqz7rLwU29uNHuzqdwPvq4UVFSR VIM+U86TAJkWlnDxhbf22XY/p8CbKoEdlf12aVzR8UyhORTBRN5gXWiXc69m+2DhioM5 scIF1g7zP0r48deaVDXYd+P7xwWd6KyO4CpHZ4aDMKOkEIrxLIQpnLomoxWeX6CWS9+u Opv3Zdy63cjrj6HrXivU2fRLNdiIf4QSsliR/l2qe818XkihKCfH7/pDkRuBMzbb/Qdg noPaEyak/xQuuRRpGM2SIRfdIakZjwcpzCgza/hZENU4Ptr1v9kc19JSC4XLp1bW1MVy 6vgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5gJ8FOQhxVossQwyRm3uBXmw7GufmFrGGmDDaws9QDmYLNOznub wQNVHTjk+mZJ27Gn5wGriN9autJczw==
X-Received: by 10.36.193.199 with SMTP id e190mr4875095itg.122.1502678234137; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 19:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.164.42 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 19:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaLmYv3AMxWcNm-1DPHQK=Cbixg-G=Snjkwkbyef23MVg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150257492983.26466.3488799276681870364.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DA3AF00B-7084-454D-A1D2-5BB417EE96C8@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwaB8mdCbYjbzr6T3A5hQw3GnixuB=JhW4Ai8+_C6dEzgg@mail.gmail.com> <36659107.dMb7D4c16s@kitterma-e6430> <CAL0qLwZfp-=x806mQ91wkT5YHWeWuRT-eCKv8_VOOQtV7X4Mhg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwaLmYv3AMxWcNm-1DPHQK=Cbixg-G=Snjkwkbyef23MVg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:37:13 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXwgMQ68dmhQH18B0HJsPHA=345mKBQkPKtF9su=M00YA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/_CgAtmVUoXdj0-mhyb1awzje4UQ>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] FW: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 02:37:17 -0000

One problem I have with the current text is that it buries the lede.
It doesn't outright say what it is doing (worse because I tried to
skip the parenthetical in the paragraph that says this and it never
closes.  Then you have to sift through pages of RFC 6376 that are
largely unchanged.

It's a simple statement.  The document to make that statement should
easily fit on one page (plus one for header boilerplate, plus one for
references and back matter).

On 14 August 2017 at 11:19, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I updated the ABNF in the draft because I think if we are going to kill
>>> it, we
>>> should kill it absolutely dead.  What is the benefit of retaining
>>> obsolete
>>> features that are MUST NOT use in the ABNF?
>>
>>
>> I think the intent is to reject those signatures as no longer acceptable,
>> not render them syntactically invalid.
>
>
> Another way to look at this: I think it's more appropriate to render
> rsa-sha1 obsolete, but this approach seems as if we want to act like it
> never existed.
>
> -MSK
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dcrup mailing list
> Dcrup@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email