IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-03.txt

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 02 July 2017 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD21129B1A for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 20:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=j6TWAGXL; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=auhNyYnI
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u_VcvBv-NyN1 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 20:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (w6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 387791200C5 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 20:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 93891 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2017 03:41:46 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=16ec1.59586b7a.k1707; bh=Hy6/NFLcNMFAEi04rsQ5K3yYZwAyEWlQu3yXlMKfrVA=; b=j6TWAGXLLeiKNK17O2muFh/w0Frnv39NeuLxmn35GYQX7BM/OfreQ92dp2P8FxJEaoqpVw2lUvHKNonsPsq9xUEIwZ3z4rljQQ2i1onKgTF8cAJDozpHYoYjtbXHj1OmC3nTUnz4nH7RUYCzxLdV885Y7d/VTkhmzLSq1bSqok/NnkuuD9GSgiCsIMVKidzYFsr7XeyEZmknImrtveDJeHig7sSWmup+giSF5kVBxx7iYZ4wy8Qh3Az1dtkPlm8B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=16ec1.59586b7a.k1707; bh=Hy6/NFLcNMFAEi04rsQ5K3yYZwAyEWlQu3yXlMKfrVA=; b=auhNyYnICgdVyXbGhILJqhShnyc8ApqE1E4aR0T8vsTpteFZ61h5MZCaY0+sQiNh6z2v5IU5n7MRW3CDcbQrOMk2Z3vXsP32Z1C0jSBwj/UZCaER/VKPbYb9z7xb8hfsO8hwmdLQ77A9/4rYfVkqQ/VRc1LukkVkQdHFpDUiVQ9C0U6+HaDs+fldSfTC7sVxdQHVTaOuQ1ext0sKMrtuf+EAESRpRbt9ZPXK+oJlmm7dTUEZbZQNI2lQq9lKitQo
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 02 Jul 2017 03:41:45 -0000
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 23:41:45 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707012341180.70305@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBM4KEr5CEZq4t9BX50btCRPLhZBAtZN18v_6gZ5B-ni5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBOs1yZ7q3oBgNeVkw=zSQb_SuS4hqK8BH0ebrD5LRYTFg@mail.gmail.com> <20170702025650.55902.qmail@ary.lan> <CABcZeBM4KEr5CEZq4t9BX50btCRPLhZBAtZN18v_6gZ5B-ni5A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/aV0lHyDAzjVHbRtOo2cGhSHwsAQ>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 03:41:49 -0000

> The point of the fingerprints was to make it easier to use long RSA keys.
>
> That may have been your point, but when I suggested it, my objective was to
> future proof the protocol against other algorithms with larger keys as well.

I'm wondering how likely that is.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status