Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-02.txt
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 12 June 2017 09:26 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77DB1294DB for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XR_SO-I7HRGl for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B2AE1294BD for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id m77so23789207lfe.0 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wUCwbUbLX66V7QG4sbHbAGJ+DtdCJ02khJSs74/0RaM=; b=WDAVEymb3TRb1zsyIqOkPY1IiShePVPUUt2//iGEBiogQTTfYrrvQwlJV27s1IGDsd OoqMYqPY+5Lon/dPDdE3tbvGN30pPkrhpe6vM8tGMqSckAw+QwIkGAySp+R9y2EzzcIO yj6b031RXbGsn5/DuQzfSDa7ZRc0eIvqjln3Ocp96vAxgyTEyorThLtbjHm14IduLZY8 oFTVJOeD7xJBj/SDIcWJqdPtwd47NjGMIHt5K31GyyW3PGaS4TmP3Rq6AubsSaipN9w5 idROStux4wn5bnP23ssI2OzKNCIWsCpMrFiERnAFeI9Z5ODy6Zo1xVq6VsmctNc+KrZR v7lg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wUCwbUbLX66V7QG4sbHbAGJ+DtdCJ02khJSs74/0RaM=; b=mNEW6x+WE0QrNLeFvW3zJ0rclTVuIjnNDqSAi67twXcAmXnuVptCsnoj+g++ZAQwG+ FwHEY6HWl8vl0sMPQ4ST++/VsdRU7GqO8mHRgODvD405z1MUj4Kz6LzRzvlNqVQcHNGO /Bng+c6xPGJJaAWA9PJfcaf1/wdr/RzRPUL3OF8z2alT09l8jbCRapIppx5tlATt5Obi 4he06T+Wrj+I13hbZIW4pDsO2lg0B0EKdZptu4yARys2hm9NwW85gpdViEfuJaeQ57pg oWWDA4tYF+eU2CYBniYhQ/30ZnHKTtcdi1lY7jrR/9x6MICfAyelVjRVDV37kiERPSJM 4qRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOworOwfKjxCl0Srkf804gbn6HWS0CBesTJej+tS+b5bo61I+dKu tj/Fhgi3Bos67SHrkUI4W+aPwcXxd2xu
X-Received: by 10.25.87.6 with SMTP id l6mr1193524lfb.76.1497259614278; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.8.66 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170611231340.17586.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <CABkgnnXAVni8Xgms2snX9LrGRd+xKuyt8VTU_XmXgh4ksBqHEw@mail.gmail.com> <20170611231340.17586.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:26:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUxsWUwiKvee7ngFNv5jz8==c1mAJpJYD3eD5VMKZqntQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/cJQsp-NAOwxuTbh9Wda6_CblsMc>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:26:58 -0000
On 12 June 2017 at 00:13, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: >>1156 is better, but I was hoping for a bit higher than that. I would >>include text that suggests this (explaining the limitations you set >>out regarding the whitespace and so forth), but note that the >>additional security margin is, well, marginal. > > Of course it is. My draft has two approaches to stronger crypto in > 256 bytes of TXT. One is key hashes with the key in the signature, > the other is elliptic crypto. > > At this point it seems likely that we'll do the elliptic crypto so I'm > inclined to skip the key hashes. This is an odd angle to take here. Key hashes would remove the limit entirely. I appreciate that you think that 1024-1156 is of marginal benefit, but the benefit of key hashes is that you can use the existing, certified, and tested primitives AND keys that you have already. It's a much smaller increment. That makes me inclined to think that hashed-RSA has some value.
- [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-0… internet-drafts
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Russ Housley
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Mark D. Baushke
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… John Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… John R Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Jim Fenton
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Jim Fenton
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Phillip Hallam-Baker