Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07D8131841
 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id knWXrtx3tfYx for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com
 [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814991250B8
 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 56993 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2017 20:53:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18)
 by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 19 Jun 2017 20:53:31 -0000
Date: 19 Jun 2017 20:53:09 -0000
Message-ID: <20170619205309.10839.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dcrup@ietf.org
Cc: johnl@taugh.com
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1706121103510.19565@ary.local>
Organization: 
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/cYCje5VgvVCn7ULmq0vjd9kZhRE>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] Is there anything this WG wants to do not yet in
 draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-01 ?
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>,
 <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>,
 <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 20:53:34 -0000

Not to nag or anything, but I think this draft addresses everything in the WG's charter, assuming
the charter is adjusted to deprecate SHA-1.

Could people take a look and see if you agree?  If so we could move it to last call and be within
hailing distance of wrapping things up.


>* new algorithm is now EdDSA, tags updated appropriately
>
>* sha1 hash is moved to historic
>
>* place marker to splice in deprecation text from Scott's draft if we want 
>to.
>
>My draft has always provided updated text for section 3.3 of RFC 6376. 
>It says which algorithms signers and verifiers are supposed to use.