IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] FW: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 14 August 2017 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B7413441B for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 18:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2QKik4BP9Oh0 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 18:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 117AC1330CF for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 18:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id u139so43609433qka.1 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 18:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sp1R8nzIq4mrwVI31fx+/w9NLvVD0OdkOK7SviiT+ro=; b=KwZhQmxekWM2e8eb94rrFfXjsrrC8nshmkXjepIjdomh1de+6LggeicwTGzZ8dA2Nz +99g9mZVeCjYUO3T9iQ7C+NKLaiSX8+xexpq9BvACsd2o5zp+aQ1VQJtsN7Lw5ompqwk c5jtDazuBx/3HCGwzZTra/+UM9R2IdwXcamg92z4xZd83d8g3UKIizUVYAkXI0KZprQ9 aAxZPLIewjGs41yJZLWQCg5un2gWhXAZb4OCQbr+fFKbPFs3Kq2xzJ00xOv/GsARsO7l xrr/H9zIPAW9LeWk0cKvqW4CIAWOloUBQKTncGMpChXtaAKQmbk1JxbIoS5s2lJKI1VK ZX2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sp1R8nzIq4mrwVI31fx+/w9NLvVD0OdkOK7SviiT+ro=; b=Sqk8hoznPCGy24eu8CTOaZaDFIC7tY3gtXWQ3wz2tFGzPPE2i3CRA/NwjfN0aO2TOQ 5iiL0VNaZyO4T8U47i6qZH01PEHW9XznI87xs7xgF7VyjkM3l6m2AQOfF/LM63LvRihZ ECrw5mDtOE8urDhOexE6ubuEed20niNPh4c0caoYvK2TbwWDa+VnJM0jgDiIT/j3mSpX 08n0i4bplM09dBADAJd1WQ0Tq3XmLmOsE5j1H3eXzAi0YHMZ3tyqiHRPhFq8qNSiMd3d mqnT5Bkll7LVXjnRXRyO6L/gO8tpa6mdHD4iomQas5bDArHYCJk7sMrgd9Cy3RO1wlPi +0UQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iWKN62YxZy3a/79jqwZZotD3jZRjmBxNPMB4cJThLR4JPkeEFe zMNxngLawxpJsIV2B205VWSRqDD9ILDj
X-Received: by 10.55.66.84 with SMTP id p81mr27136331qka.243.1502673589144; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 18:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.57.34 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 18:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZfp-=x806mQ91wkT5YHWeWuRT-eCKv8_VOOQtV7X4Mhg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150257492983.26466.3488799276681870364.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DA3AF00B-7084-454D-A1D2-5BB417EE96C8@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwaB8mdCbYjbzr6T3A5hQw3GnixuB=JhW4Ai8+_C6dEzgg@mail.gmail.com> <36659107.dMb7D4c16s@kitterma-e6430> <CAL0qLwZfp-=x806mQ91wkT5YHWeWuRT-eCKv8_VOOQtV7X4Mhg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 18:19:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaLmYv3AMxWcNm-1DPHQK=Cbixg-G=Snjkwkbyef23MVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114abe307e91570556ac7537"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/dzqcffYFhmxvTq15OVSuXKXuM_c>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] FW: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 01:19:52 -0000

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>> I updated the ABNF in the draft because I think if we are going to kill
>> it, we
>> should kill it absolutely dead.  What is the benefit of retaining obsolete
>> features that are MUST NOT use in the ABNF?
>>
>
> I think the intent is to reject those signatures as no longer acceptable,
> not render them syntactically invalid.
>

Another way to look at this: I think it's more appropriate to render
rsa-sha1 obsolete, but this approach seems as if we want to act like it
never existed.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email