IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] [taugh.com-standards] Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-12

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Wed, 20 June 2018 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C516213111F for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZJd1StEetxqR for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B44E4130F58 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8921 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2018 19:38:25 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=22d6.5b2aad31.k1806; bh=kOOqveVcSeW0xsdabHW5Zv1dCqD2xglKxacTpuy7e3A=; b=axIK/ikTqQPqHfU2wxU+fddwe7lB2vto6vJHWFk7iYEzb/r44Ww0CpPxsz9lF8Ol1bdAAv2ozW5z8HTfgeCvtDqEMwHAVu7vhzssZbigudlW46v/i8I+De1N635061ZHkckCJZylgeFCmzesXPoKqpq3KJAAaIxIKEjE0+VvJSC1q+OhoBk09xOA7iuSeMGW8Hp45d1xU+f7URaF4DJF38/9Hwp4bBsH5XfvTO6l3b0f88eXnYSonEr0JjMxBXu0
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 20 Jun 2018 19:38:24 -0000
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:38:24 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1806201536380.20795@ary.qy>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, dcrup@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto.all@ietf.org, rsalz@akamai.com, Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, alexey.melnikov@isode.com, ben@nostrum.com, adam@nostrum.com, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, fenton@bluepopcorn.net
In-Reply-To: <1C53D9C5-490D-4494-860F-C5DF50B181C9@cooperw.in>
References: <152873414342.2872.16681801090252484956@ietfa.amsl.com> <1C53D9C5-490D-4494-860F-C5DF50B181C9@cooperw.in>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/hXURwQhWGE8evGRP1MjZ4Gago48>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:51:44 -0700
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] [taugh.com-standards] Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-12
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:45:09 -0000

> Pete, thanks for your review. I think the whole point of chartering DCRUP was to produce documents such as this.
> John, thanks for updating to reference RFC 8174, although I agree with Adam that the boilerplate should match 8174.

It's fixed in the copy I have here, waiting to see what other nits to 
fix show up in LC before posting the final.

By the way, there are comments in the XML pointing out the stuff to 
remove, which have been there all along.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email