IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] rsa-sha1 usage

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 14 June 2017 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8865A131AE5 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3sBdPrvbuGpp for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D332C1205F0 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id 191so73396528vko.2 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HbRat+ZdftA5bS3mKW3aJ8SHacEo6LKh7h1MuTFRJPU=; b=uN/TXKysMOBGwfoKf/FnJi99hD+e51ZSTCeqvqXC+2bCOc+CQnUJSKi05W5pr9Zzw4 j2OzdkndffmQFW3kAUQj+E/vtBMHmwZcZQ4YJBxuRh+5Zvmh+aG4xwSaUvP85wV1pPD/ 5fr9oh9pqIb9WIA1JwKgDKXTEL9zKCGPN+dN4TBWcvh/aTph3cIwYynxpqiJwAbXVzwa IGwe552sXwFQtZvQAbNYDKjNQkZTKkkAmOhUIUgYGWyw8r1ifqu/MMhRPRBn01UIoMlt JTZ6SO+xG4HIJR31hPWCJabUm2yiCB1Zq9/SF7sTLP4JW5Cv5OTps73lQT1mdateRZDN 6K2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HbRat+ZdftA5bS3mKW3aJ8SHacEo6LKh7h1MuTFRJPU=; b=ppH03OdTcibVQgXAMntK0vCZGCAh+UvJgIwuBwCjH8O1eUbEbnWjAlL+FBooex2zWP GVu2k7/ItHVEVVdO7luih6hLjCOFUlnYYrEiBUJwyqn7y0n42uZgwk1saVgt75xS87Bi oiCMcoAmtzhRDLrqvFVe16iHYNbDtIhdp9Lfzw28eUQ0S8UwEDnNGc1xo/jScjE04tZH xLOiZ5LhnbC5bMwWq8KOW9EgK5skGBXRNGiYKbUNmzGJAFFgEuwcJwiJMPYQw7RKmxRa qAVsS7PRmiJvDy9zHjj6PUW9vPXEFvwwCjYnXHhXS83WH4myKalxwBoamqlSsjggU7eE DLhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzSYM4ywUVqTT8ZO+nukiCVDIoNKdPxOjnNZ8mKfJg8xxuyyiD/ AVY8j2gVlID3OwgdYwNYUVPm5l9zbRLs
X-Received: by 10.31.97.197 with SMTP id v188mr1651609vkb.132.1497404405979; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.126.6 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <29B74569-6BB3-43F8-9549-566DA405B1FF@kitterman.com>
References: <m38tkw53bd.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <CABa8R6s6rzc+Ky8sLWcK7NtforSksEhNRkWVeF=k1v8GC80knw@mail.gmail.com> <m3wp8gpx20.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <CAOj=BA2O+Hf2VGOtbmnqY2M5J9u8uJ7wm7SxEW551SXBwDdanw@mail.gmail.com> <5bf52517591d4950aec335d31bcf3631@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <aa52134a-ac20-bd70-8834-1598a8eaa536@bluepopcorn.net> <29B74569-6BB3-43F8-9549-566DA405B1FF@kitterman.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:40:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaqPwb+cNhRCWLBp2qjTWtS65JAvstc9GfrhDDXRv+d6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0944a4b41e580551e1a1d9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/mml2cbb0sRGOyStaZiO_KYlInBU>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] rsa-sha1 usage
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 01:40:08 -0000

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> I think your proposed remedy is too mild though.  Given the degree to
> which the SHOULD NOT sign rsa-sha1 has been ignored for the last decade, I
> don't believe anything other than MUST NOT sign/MUST NOT verify rsa-sha1 is
> very useful.
>

That being the case, why do we think people will pay attention to a MUST
NOT today?

-MSK

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status