IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-02.txt

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Thu, 08 June 2017 05:50 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69414126C3D for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UWbhHC7mlEJC for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [IPv6:2607:f0d0:3001:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C19A120726 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kitterma-e6430.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6039CC401DD for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 00:50:19 -0500 (CDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1496901019; bh=00huhCfYyytfOMIGE/wRWTiTdB71qVn7hSFSFuFSk4s=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CceGq1RVkaxCs1zM5wJ7hPyBBtZAZPcs+7MGG4qQWireNdiBgDl0SU7W67jigj/sv puB0T/9nS9pbSjtQ1b/ZuzuIELSlz/GsHyv9xneFbiKkwMqcY1GhjnmtX6I6Q4Xvb+ jbdPGctW0ybngEKoSvEn/H1ungox69FnOBojYGO4=
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dcrup@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 01:50:13 -0400
Message-ID: <59890109.NLzkLIiF7F@kitterma-e6430>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-119-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <149690083334.25644.8501543904193079634@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <149690083334.25644.8501543904193079634@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/nfDJugl7MtX45ZJeMNn5e5vEeT8>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 05:50:22 -0000

On Wednesday, June 07, 2017 10:47:13 PM internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This draft is a work item of the DKIM Crypto Update of the
> IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Cryptographic Algorithm and Key Usage Update to
> DKIM Author          : Scott Kitterman
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 6
> 	Date            : 2017-06-07
> 
> Abstract:
>    The cryptographic algorithm and key size requirements included when
>    DKIM was designed in the last decade are functionally obsolete and in
>    need of immediate revision.  This document updates DKIM requirements
>    to those minimaly suitable for operation with currently specified
>    algorithms.  This document updates RFC 6376.

There are only a few small changes in this revision.  I applied the diff I 
posted in response to msk's suggestion about saying even less about rsa-sha1 
and I filled out the acknowledgements with everyone who's commented about the 
draft (if I missed you or you'd rather not be listed, please let me know).

Please give this revision a good review and based on the feedback to date, I 
think it's pretty close to done.

Scott K

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status