IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] I-D draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-06

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> Thu, 14 September 2017 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <cloos@jhcloos.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F008B133045 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jhcloos.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZhaZ-EqqgYO8 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (ore.jhcloos.com [IPv6:2604:2880::b24d:a297]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D88BD133053 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 0AA471DFA9; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:25:54 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=ore17; t=1505406354; bh=zcC4+3it3u1p36rLkHbLv6AheZdFDdjj2ah4huwzpa4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=pzs6T6yeEQggd3NUIQ4GcYy5MI084Zuih6Wp9cRsF/q2sRVOU11xvuVoKgyGzH2/3 +kU+dOGnfJW2pfZZFzw5q3iM3Cb9fQvsNlh/ZsdhcQAOqyvMutpNbQxPX9Yqgb6n3A sqHG05Od2vTzHV2xz8YJvpjxCUDQ+LFA01lDor/ri+Hv6RB4tVx4s04sdSNd9HLxqj 5kXRiDzeFeW+3gVxaCjv/yWHwSmhqj9qE7HiOa6VURelmpErOYMHaqb8dPf/r85s5T krlf0hEpKPDw7Ag0azm5kJzAzmo+f+M9K3iZJIUZDZVj94QfHCfCgQoCihfLdi5CwZ DetPdaEzUEa1Q==
Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id D5282107BF440; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:24:34 +0000 (UTC)
From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: dcrup@ietf.org
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, jgh@wizmail.org
In-Reply-To: <20170914014118.2378.qmail@ary.lan> (John Levine's message of "14 Sep 2017 01:41:18 -0000")
References: <20170914014118.2378.qmail@ary.lan>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC
Copyright: Copyright 2017 James Cloos
OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6; url=https://jhcloos.com/public_key/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc
OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:24:34 -0400
Message-ID: <m3vakl9rjx.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Lines: 15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Hashcash: 1:28:170914:dcrup@ietf.org::ZcpdvFQ3XhytfcR9:002u667
X-Hashcash: 1:28:170914:johnl@taugh.com::FRsyM9WxiMrzUKUj:00w3a7
X-Hashcash: 1:28:170914:jgh@wizmail.org::s9auAZtnmSlVxsQE:0JpzeM
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/nqtVcMzafM3nFbI08zRR6i6qaBA>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] I-D draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-06
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:25:56 -0000

>>>>> "JL" == John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> writes:

JL> I haven't looked in detail at the APIs for Ed25519 crypto, but naively
JL> assumed that if the spec says there's a pure version that doesn't hash
JL> its input, the libraries would implement it.

I thought that the consensus was the opposite.  Wasn't esr demanding
that and everyone else arguing the opposite?

It is certainly the case the the "pure" version of eddsa is unlikely to
get much support by the crypto libraries.

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status