Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-02.txt

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 13 June 2017 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A454313162E for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 03:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wbimoGC49XZv for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 03:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9135E130A94 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 03:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id m77so42961058lfe.0 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 03:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lASmMSZvUHtXs7fv5AG1oXEISrEL/sTVLMmmeseiplg=; b=o0WezCM6vjbdl4Srtc0LjoRLuNuXajtA9+rbrr/cHtoME39BdOLwY4+uAdoJuCh7qB Jl2wOBkci94c3KzMIVv4z5unTaV2jPUNtnUaI5SNOdyl7Ls/D3k7M6OqiLq/+dg4J6WG aTItbcM6r1tPF2VR5++Gu1WCwUHqFhDnlH4jPjR+eCpwwEXYfJ3KA1MVbGQpjdH7mbQZ yZghgwzKYLWJ7UhXIxdXOb94XlcMKpwM0pZrCvITJe6gaKgP0JH016qO2yGMLzPlqcjy Ghd1xlR5CAqq+9Td2v5IWB2TwFLda7SatOMJgXi5GL/fL1XVSjFtQfXetkI3U+FSDAIl R2Wg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lASmMSZvUHtXs7fv5AG1oXEISrEL/sTVLMmmeseiplg=; b=E4zX49g6fVkwGVNbOO7wrgwEIQVmDQ1+mTjSpqlHgL0/S9VzQ+EaT+SxIXIC1DjLsB tl88PkQn28I4C8FaQDze2xNbR7oiu3qSrliJyL3kfGsnc4gbg2rJAl8TfSTICfZhVucF wD8aJ9qXmk5Wdsq900EzmL/NLpyf8jzCE3q8GDlhOhjt2kiTjJslfVeMMGXk/xXHNtH8 K3GR/L6KKN5eEI/H9s7iWCu7F0bsuhaYsxL0J22c1Pv9fse5kPkJy0iOufejO+1H7z7a BjlDLFVB7zd9qqs9brML5umTvNRv0KarduDl5+vwCUuVNY/lniMynD8NWZ+aswLsXjX7 Lrng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxw1yt7RW4zPpMtov/k+KK53nC8v4RTcnmfv0Gtle4TwSZe88W5 migszkz+EnLRwomvyhZ4bhvoqjAD46xb
X-Received: by 10.25.196.17 with SMTP id u17mr2712168lff.19.1497351162810; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 03:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.8.66 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 03:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <17424575.60yUzU31nn@kitterma-e6430>
References: <149690083334.25644.8501543904193079634@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABkgnnXDN3One0FZCi63ssMVtnYv-nRRR+_-gLdMMpXzW=hYrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwakBY+LtrkQEPBKDwCrUg_qk_ZRhexUz_D_mw+dUUo6xQ@mail.gmail.com> <17424575.60yUzU31nn@kitterma-e6430>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:52:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWuiydrm9y7PHeUonkdpJ3fV1ybbH5uBZE0tPGHr5mw1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/p-MYDCj5kGUeLxFlKS8rz4yfcB8>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:57:42 -0000

On 12 June 2017 at 22:39, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> wrote:
> What's the proper result for a rsa-sha1 signed message that passes DKIM
> verification?


Oh, I see where you are coming from.  I think that you need text that
says "an rsa-sha1 signature MUST be ignored by a verifier".  I think
that answers the questions about "rely on" more clearly.