Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and document shepherds
Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Sat, 10 June 2017 19:59 UTC
Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092A01270FC for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CBMewh5w1lME for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [IPv6:2607:f0d0:3001:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E4B4126C3D for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kitterma-e6430.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E9FBC403A4 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:59:17 -0500 (CDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1497124757; bh=kJm2r2aHyvcasTfJwEM7lCLbrzKr5ukKUaClF8Y6sIk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oDITlQJoWPPRsdTREklykBvtDSl/9FSIZ/+RLuNXI6uRCnKUYmkYqnmNXEJumuwSu RS7hYZlJTX52INyWM4Z/PA7lLhILueIsU1UL8P59/11NTRuyVLgRH5b2Qc6kdj4M1Y bQfDeefDmyMUtT9KP8PfOclHMXeiKRRFO98AFMGc=
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dcrup@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 15:59:16 -0400
Message-ID: <3226783.Zmkt5g0zON@kitterma-e6430>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-119-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <006b65316e4640b09ef9e08350048695@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <33024B2C-DBF1-44DC-A18E-973D4C8ACD12@kitterman.com> <20170610193159.15077.qmail@ary.lan> <006b65316e4640b09ef9e08350048695@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/qE8oPqyQ5s0Ti71Xj09dFSpnGTM>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and document shepherds
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:59:20 -0000
On Saturday, June 10, 2017 07:45:09 PM Salz, Rich wrote: > > >I think you are substantially underestimating the time it will take to > > >get IETF consensus on a new approach based on ECC. I think if it's done > > >in a> > > year, that'll be fast. > > > > I sure hope you're wrong. > > CFRG already spent all the time working to get consensus on algorithms. We > should be able to have a WGLC-ready document in a couple of months, if we > can get a direction and writer(s) by Prague. Given that (which I wasn't aware of), I'll revise my estimate downwards. I still think a separate draft for clearing out the obsolete cruft is worth advancing and getting done. Scott K
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… John Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Seth Blank
- [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and document … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… John Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] we need to do the work, was draft-iet… John Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-… John R. Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] we need to do the work, was draft-iet… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Dcrup] we need to do the work, was draft-iet… John R Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-… John Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Kurt Andersen
- Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] sequence of drafts, draft-ietf-dcrup-… John Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-02 and r… John Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Seth Blank
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Kurt Andersen
- Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and docum… Murray S. Kucherawy