Re: [Dcrup] Time For People To Really Stop Using SHA-1 Signatures?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 08 January 2020 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570D7120020 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 16:03:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0iG3R7se5vPp for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 16:03:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6F22120018 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 16:03:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586A4300B36 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:03:38 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 6anzLnyq_1y8 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:03:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [5.5.33.18] (unknown [204.194.23.17]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3447C30078C; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:03:37 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <1836468.B6t98xBJ9D@l5580>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:03:37 -0500
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <4CDB0BF6-4341-47C0-B647-A9DC5E912195@vigilsec.com>
References: <1836468.B6t98xBJ9D@l5580>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/smB8yRS4iB2YWu0N7JYfoPD6xaw>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] Time For People To Really Stop Using SHA-1 Signatures?
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:03:41 -0000

> https://sha-mbles.github.io/
> 
> If I'm reading this right, the last excuse that still trusting SHA-1 DKIM 
> signatures is an OK thing to do is gone.  Comments from anyone that really 
> understands thus stuff would be appreciated.

Here is the research paper: chttps://eprint.iacr.org/2020/014

Russ