IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] I-D draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-06

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 21 November 2017 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3C6129B52 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:03:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQmovtxdC2ia for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BA85128C83 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 69227 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2017 22:03:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.53) by gal.iecc.com with QMQP; 21 Nov 2017 22:03:56 -0000
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 22:03:34 -0000
Message-ID: <20171121220334.8209.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dcrup@ietf.org
Cc: jgh@wizmail.org
In-Reply-To: <383fef94-84c4-9b54-5566-a6fa1279aa38@wizmail.org>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/t95fOMLYU-cNvy2o8PRjyWl_Tq0>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] I-D draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-06
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 22:04:00 -0000

Keeping in mind that you're responding to a message I wrote two months ago ...

In article <383fef94-84c4-9b54-5566-a6fa1279aa38@wizmail.org> you write:
>Wouldn't it be more aesthetically pleasing to decouple, for dkim
>a=ed25519-sha256 signing, the hash used for the body (sha256 as
>specified by the 'a' tag) from the hash used for signing headers
>(sha512, I think, but whatever the libraries have tied to
>Ed25519 signing)?

No.

R's,
John

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status