[Dcrup] No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500
Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sun, 10 December 2023 10:25 UTC
Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352A6C14CF18 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 02:25:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=tana.it header.b="Ees68i7y"; dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.b="Cn9jpDUE"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGenPu4hZcW6 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 02:25:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [94.198.96.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D33EFC14CF1B for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 02:25:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=epsilon; t=1702203900; bh=5d25XGORJ5I5OCjMdV5S4QXvgOV7xI0rDl9mIIE1JGg=; h=Author:Date:To:From:Subject; b=Ees68i7y5cqK8x99UHHbtK+curBZa7DMIly3tKOtzuFJkPnO8zq3PI6UDM0wP4WFM cSg97/UNUmXApCcbOiaBQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1702203900; bh=5d25XGORJ5I5OCjMdV5S4QXvgOV7xI0rDl9mIIE1JGg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=Cn9jpDUEJWRZqAlnjSRPKMU3RaCOHbPg7bEOnySmT9tV5peTNknOdd4MY2wXtv4ki PM0o2bcMyN4nTydFg4rxP75GrcEgxpESyQT/NL5uouD63g36M90RPFEv5rVMfZGWlA PtJZngbZ+aruuwFNzkUnAMEXTbGCSZXFQ+ogmtO8p0E3IIKcyzPqJx1GAH55U
Original-Subject: No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (host-87-15-8-196.retail.telecomitalia.it [87.15.8.196]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC083.00000000657591FB.000023DF; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:24:59 +0100
Message-ID: <7dab1e86-7a09-6031-6f43-41439f74e516@tana.it>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:24:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Content-Language: en-US, it
To: dcrup@ietf.org
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/tUi5Eqkv4CJfC4TOf1EpJVzTFgI>
Subject: [Dcrup] No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 10:25:24 -0000
Hi all (if any), it wasn't clear to me whether a DKIM filter should check for publicly known test keys. Then, I noted that there doesn't seem to be any ed25519 test key in RFC 9500. Does that mean a DKIM filter doesn't have to compare signing keys against a set of predefined test keys? Perhaps the t=y tag is enough. Best Ale --
- [Dcrup] No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500 Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [Dcrup] No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500 Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500 Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [Dcrup] No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500 Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500 Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500 Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [Dcrup] No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500 Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500 Salz, Rich
- Re: [Dcrup] No ed25519 test keys in RFC 9500 Hector Santos