Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-02.txt

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 12 June 2017 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF391294D8 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d9ZWuACfXwxg for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22f.google.com (mail-lf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650F01204DA for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id m77so24000260lfe.0 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Kcn9f+3e2XLvPSVDV8II4Mogzm99Y/ypE8ONBg/ojpY=; b=ZvlqxVQE+9jLBjJz3Y3fP7C0LpbQ0hN2meccwRZNn+TXMHrCnm9aZc87rMU29oSYJd i3DiAqZszMsLfkc7ENehfQ0ayr/PRxcC0z8fEixNoZha6n3PSgGSt8WUh6nEtgILtUYo 1JK2cCciTm4ll/uZkIebulYwKC51WyNlyeXaMsh/K7drsQC1jjDSjzZ3Z4eGQviPXezE mgydkk6qXEdwlR5EkmG55PWXih/kxJSoqEezrIGIN+HflZPsvsOHPduE4kyL3vnsrAs2 hyRz9xxUbQ3JSETZv7ZA+3r4Lkgv2x8WQlUNxm0q4wVClNzLexnG+YEGH6NrckoEAfCf tG1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Kcn9f+3e2XLvPSVDV8II4Mogzm99Y/ypE8ONBg/ojpY=; b=L1AKjJfMXiZRaJ5SLLCxA0bju4q4PQ16EA1TriiRT9YexasQYEO6WWVKmUTZSqtGF0 1GvE4cWoPogRqdM4+z3YJvP45rmoYRtBV911Z6opq6NkWzCe+shQnDurbRI7qOf0K527 CodJ4T/3Ob68pcnoEhzkaWC1CjtAJYlQS6LGXCTEQi45e62cOShufC+alFZ4XMwW8K/K 27trI3ixiniGg7jXkzWJBq5uXHPsR053RPMDvpZXm6lFyX7Ss9lekjQCHEWpYkoCC2uZ Ou2TYBkJ8ck2ULA2ka3V5WooQs5Pgjxf9JsL1gtXxQjJlf9T8jSzIB8LQWjCzk3zsCYS MUqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCGDw/Ke8U8igeBDaBIjsvTCLWQ/sJPyHOD/NNkqg+n+8XTIlPX 6ocRZSg57p9Aojyw184jFfBba1YcaQ==
X-Received: by 10.46.84.28 with SMTP id i28mr9052675ljb.44.1497260978694; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.8.66 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1706121039140.19565@ary.local>
References: <CABkgnnXAVni8Xgms2snX9LrGRd+xKuyt8VTU_XmXgh4ksBqHEw@mail.gmail.com> <20170611231340.17586.qmail@ary.lan> <CABkgnnUxsWUwiKvee7ngFNv5jz8==c1mAJpJYD3eD5VMKZqntQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1706121039140.19565@ary.local>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:49:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX8zD+MookvPhvPJxQxrzjtEscDa5CoMpxbJ0e+j=hYfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/tpRxqn-UO04WqsX4BPDjUgszqcM>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:49:42 -0000

On 12 June 2017 at 10:45, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> If the RFC 8032 algorithm isn't existing, certified, and tested, we've got
> problems beyond DCRUP.

That wasn't my point.  It was that deploying something based on RSA is
potentially more attractive.  That's a trend I've witnessed.  Cautious
management/developers/operations will avoid the new thing for a range
of reasons.