Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-02.txt
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 12 June 2017 14:41 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1A8129411 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 07:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eoeXpliNsZ8C for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 07:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04BAE1289B5 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 07:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id m77so27360167lfe.0 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 07:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3dFDNQD9oc/ewRJe4OzAYG0Wd+T2/XyV9d2syzyZZMY=; b=COgoWQqT91tTFMvzkfjHd7mIADeyrUu6zDfh1hnEdHdLV5p8F/6enK+77k0w6y0DUj PmEQGkBRoqM5qUX/mbp/qpeJlkfBnYcwj5LOs9mEvnwkpx5fo9lg2plUQwfsRTPGyGaC HjGsMwxf0i0fV0VwCScmMIicSeC8QRyXwbNBYULCbxBNaqJMu9brl06zEk+3+gOEj6RI zHSeXYWKIfP6Vb9INuvwW/AtyIlg6GHH3+3lfq/2e/U5pj23jFkZssqm4AWC7Et2AA8M 5SKWCuTaWCwLWshl0A1RVZcBB12jMqPKgqYa6+SXvX8dVALLEC2BZg1wik/SEtXYqMih u2hA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3dFDNQD9oc/ewRJe4OzAYG0Wd+T2/XyV9d2syzyZZMY=; b=Px7hbZCtztqWLPjOUMZpQMQl/uEigC2L0mLxN7nLhSQY7TJHs7OTFTJ5RAdIaw6M8O Ewz2rg/qNqRySzuHM2KLNVpBfQsFV+wwXh/PxkHb2hxD5cfOJKNimVpjbgh62OhPNVik C2nPjX8OpDCgYoIWVDdwxA2i4fCYy4ud4BGr6tWyPxHFhjnb3rq4P2S3oP0TEUcl70rd aIgk0eDmrmAfU1qTEj8mbTJG/JpfkAcBFYE2+lcwbbcbnJcjVqcmf9RwG4nn2wu22b1H 4T1TwLpLGhEc6Q10SzE6mCwvNKVp/jan2Nl3BLPkww4C8aNtDMV0Buo/Eind3eErS+r7 7+AA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBRuKxUMuesGWTqXbQtiHYjTC56OSPiLumGLYyp3S4GOZDy5c/9 N7Ike1iW8LvRVoSJVsxsGTaqq9vv3Ce099Q=
X-Received: by 10.46.76.1 with SMTP id z1mr16352773lja.128.1497278462232; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 07:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.8.66 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1828951.1dWPTdrTAp@kitterma-e6430>
References: <149690083334.25644.8501543904193079634@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwZYO-=fz=qCt5V-kAAtf0+6qoSTU1wEp7go2PVSD0ZKiw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXAVni8Xgms2snX9LrGRd+xKuyt8VTU_XmXgh4ksBqHEw@mail.gmail.com> <1828951.1dWPTdrTAp@kitterma-e6430>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 15:41:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXDN3One0FZCi63ssMVtnYv-nRRR+_-gLdMMpXzW=hYrQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/uCCWX7JZuAMaSrTp6w-qvpyBNu8>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 14:41:06 -0000
On 12 June 2017 at 15:32, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> wrote: > The way to do that would be to remove it from the protocol, which you seem to > oppose, so I'm confused. I don't oppose removing it from the protocol in practice, it's just that you can't pretend that the old version doesn't exist, and nor should you care. The point is to not USE it, the definition becomes harmless at that point. > 1024 is operationally very common. In the end, if it matters, I don't mind > adding this discussion, but I also don't see any reason to set the floor > higher than 1024 (I don't think there's enough security advantage in 1156 over > 1024 to matter). This I agree with. The reason I suggested this is that your current draft doesn't *actually* include any new advice about key sizes. 1156 would be advice you could give, but as I said, that's of marginal benefit.
- [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-0… internet-drafts
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Russ Housley
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Mark D. Baushke
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… John Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… John R Levine
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Jim Fenton
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Jim Fenton
- Re: [Dcrup] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usa… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Dcrup] stronger crypto, I-D Action: draft-ie… Phillip Hallam-Baker