IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] we need to do the work, was draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and document shepherds

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 10 June 2017 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1C2129420 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 11:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BPiMgEDh_jlD for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 11:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE36126C83 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 11:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v5AIRno9031844; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:29:36 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=CfXNndG0lAMhiJTDQtc302Wzld5B56nUnXBBiU9oatw=; b=YoJslr/RRCW3Xf9nnmeD+kZZ6+Q0Xr/aT4OlrMqB4OZWIxICaf/ZQ7nHCj7BkckxMH4T D+qwNMRit0Mx3ArTlx1JWPXgp8Cu1ufmy9tz4wbfb9gmYC9XYoHM2nxhV3RxKYugVGAk KtJYEHhaO2eS1y3O5/Ut28oHFtdCHx3fuQQnaYlNn/RBUrjYV97Ka0u8bJY2dSL9djBH LuWOAeeETGUEKe1i9Lz1RnA7cFfYFlh+PlGt18ohe3mklwewVbyVOWIs0vV9TgO9+tcS Du7nn6XMJ/iRElOD89vjE5Opr1DQa+I7FofH/M2WqVREm2SAOEAhTDt5bM9KQ0N9x59u 3Q==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (a184-51-33-19.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2b096b2kk3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 10 Jun 2017 19:29:36 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v5AIQUGO000423; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:29:35 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2b0c3u1742-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:29:35 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:29:33 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:29:33 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "dcrup@ietf.org" <dcrup@ietf.org>
CC: "sklist@kitterman.com" <sklist@kitterman.com>
Thread-Topic: [Dcrup] we need to do the work, was draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and document shepherds
Thread-Index: AQHS4eiQsw/ddRnyGkSZUMFLQTl9oqIeaKgA
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 18:29:32 +0000
Message-ID: <68d03c39527d4f3d972e45c877d248ba@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <DE201939-EA16-4957-B160-2B45B3BA60C1@kitterman.com> <20170610125300.14197.qmail@ary.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20170610125300.14197.qmail@ary.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.39.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-06-10_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1706100312
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-06-10_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1706100312
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/uDRyYG3yO7baNCXqStIq_ljeRAY>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] we need to do the work, was draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and document shepherds
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 18:29:40 -0000

Speaking as an individual and co-chair for CURDLE, not this group...

> This shouldn't be hard, we're not trying to invent anything.  I was hoping
> Scott and others who know more about crypto than I do would be making
> concrete suggestions about which elliptical algorithm to add, by now.

If there is any reason why DKIM cannot use the signature methods just-defined by CURDLE for CMS https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures/

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status