IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] I-D draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-06

Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> Tue, 21 November 2017 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jgh@wizmail.org>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A255129B79 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:28:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YPCSRKgK2GHK for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wizmail.org (wizmail.org [IPv6:2a00:1940:107::2:0:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0323A12704A for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:28:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [2a00:b900:109e:0:df75:dcf5:c97b:6fad] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by wizmail.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89.122) id 1eHHxV-0000W5-Sv for dcrup@ietf.org (return-path <jgh@wizmail.org>); Tue, 21 Nov 2017 23:28:05 +0000
To: dcrup@ietf.org
References: <20171121220334.8209.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
Message-ID: <00d888c1-64c9-9f26-0426-fbbb17fc5bdc@wizmail.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 23:28:04 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171121220334.8209.qmail@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pcms-Received-Sender: [2a00:b900:109e:0:df75:dcf5:c97b:6fad] (helo=localhost.localdomain) with esmtpsa
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/ueEmm0C59t_5FWUWjoNbrlj0xGA>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] I-D draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-06
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 23:28:09 -0000

On 21/11/17 22:03, John Levine wrote:
> Keeping in mind that you're responding to a message I wrote two months ago ...
> 
> In article <383fef94-84c4-9b54-5566-a6fa1279aa38@wizmail.org> you write:
>> Wouldn't it be more aesthetically pleasing to decouple, for dkim
>> a=ed25519-sha256 signing, the hash used for the body (sha256 as
>> specified by the 'a' tag) from the hash used for signing headers
>> (sha512, I think, but whatever the libraries have tied to
>> Ed25519 signing)?
> 
> No.

I think you need to further support your position.
-- 
Jeremy

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status