[Dcrup] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-13: (with COMMENT)
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 19 June 2018 04:31 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12412131094; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto@ietf.org, dcrup-chairs@ietf.org, fenton@bluepopcorn.net, dcrup@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152938266206.2832.5011357550871489777.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:31:02 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/yCLloxjCOrRr6yte8_8hZW9PeDA>
Subject: [Dcrup] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 04:31:03 -0000
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-13: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to the authors and working group for the work put in on this document. I have two editorial updates to suggest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC 6376, but the abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- §2: > The capitalized key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", > "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and > "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in > [RFC8174]. This text is almost, but not quite, the boilerplate from RFC 8174. Please update this paragraph to match the boilerplate.