IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and document shepherds

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 12 June 2017 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6139F129B89 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 20:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K4FuE5ra4BBf for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 20:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com (mail-vk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8125F127867 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 20:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id p62so43719566vkp.0 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 20:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZC54AhRgcyfXGwb8/X2cNL2S9DJ7S6Q7l5Dt7DFwrXk=; b=bjDar7OYij2kpN433JsbALnPZltrncvJoyovqtJVoxhA7t2kHWeooR7mUKBKh2fKRs AOxcr74LkNoPFzVq10KOYJpB4ukG61UZUpXUf4KQpuH8Xi2gPbTUfmu7Jbmdl+LM475w rE6U78whU4avzmrgWbxAPN88n350zomWItNvFEjwVVg5xk4yI4bnX7yEwAKBpcUNNysF zqitrStbO6a2VMq+y0sshPGVHPuf/+vRy+dm0L+iqLGZNp5AiQK2iVziqrm5NMZpDtLX JhOJ0Pg07dGJ590a51pc9Q6x32W80mgPL3K0yEp1Z+5qh0NDTkm5tM3IVfqwx/15/3vV 9F8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZC54AhRgcyfXGwb8/X2cNL2S9DJ7S6Q7l5Dt7DFwrXk=; b=tj8sQn3vYdQTAmqiRyKPa7hHFZvXWFHkrfe0U3qDayqomc1CCNnlU5op4cgEbMbp9C r9yrJt/I8vzTeTQG5dkxoc6rKt+BXSV4toA9AedYz++gCptDB6M0U56nYUMfeKu0XhgQ 5jOboBPcFolKGJxXWrT7o6xu97xGVbC83tWdMAXDzur+zp7cpOrIE2nO5vkOgGwEFnmB IOIqaAAXKhyga4FoWODXwubC/Q1N0kUtbwj2N+A5765ThLqtmdq5o0k5x4vex/c1CZE2 R65YrqzLqSXqt2EKu0s1XxiD5SlTeGtmxEsz+dKY71kA6pvdmvcJURk/P9hPMlExG4NU vTrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCZ0v/9MJVy6LGGWIhLLzpYbGL4HwfL9kof9gEFRpjfTF3ohxLe 2araxGQIvIzQWSNF5OGGuJD8HIL0PSLN
X-Received: by 10.31.65.197 with SMTP id o188mr26773022vka.7.1497238643657; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 20:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.138.3 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 20:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1o21f-4r4RzSdCLQAJG3ySDajc=BMFsVC9t_CNEz4ut+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170610002538.10992.qmail@ary.lan> <CBFF8363-08F6-419E-AB24-D26137627C76@kitterman.com> <CABuGu1o21f-4r4RzSdCLQAJG3ySDajc=BMFsVC9t_CNEz4ut+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 20:37:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYx9=_vqsD9=WVLqyXGoOpbTvBwDBHcZMpzdPo8LSv7UQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com>
Cc: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114dde627fd1840551bb0926"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/z5JqO8qsjZ9M_3oKM5zXZhwApgc>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage and document shepherds
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 03:37:26 -0000

On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com> wrote:

> On June 9, 2017 8:25:38 PM EDT, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
>> . . .it seems kind of premature to me.
>>
>> Why would that matter?  This draft just gets rid of the obsolete cruft.
>> It clears the deck for adding a new algorithm, but in no way requires we
>> have that sorted out.
>>
>
> While RFCs do have a cost, can the ADs weigh in on the relative benefits
> of doing this "sweep the decks clean" first update to be followed by "add
> more algorithms" vs. bundling it all together?
>

Regardless of the answer to that, I don't think we should be in some sort
of hurry here.

>From where I'm sitting, ARC has other questions it needs to work out before
this will be a pressing issue for them, and for the most part they just say
"do what DKIM does" in terms of key management anyway, so when we change
DKIM, ARC will just follow.

-MSK

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status