Re: [dd] Back to the charter
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 21 March 2024 22:19 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23194C14F6B0 for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Myk695tFY1Q3 for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DA86C14F689 for <dd@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dhcp-875e.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.135.94]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6D79E2003A; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net 6D79E2003A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1711059562; bh=MtVqYht5z+qSwFlg5BX2UVa3YWGd8cSd87hZ9LJ1NMw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=N4eq+hTwjdJMJbW2kdIIl2FXV85IqVBLQYJ9BJTHSZIgG3d/GuA7PbAxGaCMsAuJW Ge4c+LT5rkwvHfzrnnvyjbR3LRFSy1XbQQqj3kSd772Nlx4k/IbCBDP8kbEbWwb/O/ YBdKC48Dao3dw611bgdQiDfwIfocnZ+em/rmscpg=
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, dd@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn1o3UnC9QV0w7c_xikLd3gUwFHuAUQ1rhEv9-7QduOOhA@mail.gmail.com> (George Michaelson's message of "Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:02:39 +1000")
References: <49CC837E-4D8E-45CF-A0B5-7A28A82B1939@icann.org> <CAKr6gn1o3UnC9QV0w7c_xikLd3gUwFHuAUQ1rhEv9-7QduOOhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:19:19 -0700
Message-ID: <ybledc38byw.fsf@wx.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dd/0EbmmLbX51iUs-KydlmANoiC8-8>
Subject: Re: [dd] Back to the charter
X-BeenThere: dd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Delegation <dd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:19:27 -0000
George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> writes: > Strenuously avoids saying resource record/RR. Is this deliberate? I think RRs are likely the only easy way forward, but since we haven't collected requirements and design solutions yes I had a goal of leaving it open. More specifically, I didn't see a reason to definitely restrict the text to be more specific. > Not sure I like "said another way" -felt like a hedge over wording disagreements. [no hats] I actually was not a huge fan of that wording either, so send text! -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- [dd] Back to the charter Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dd] Back to the charter George Michaelson
- [dd] likely charter issues Geoff Huston
- [dd] Charter issue: resource records Paul Hoffman
- [dd] Charter issue: synchronization between paren… Paul Hoffman
- [dd] Charter issue: authority models Paul Hoffman
- [dd] Charter issue: Introduction of new signaling Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dd] Back to the charter Wes Hardaker
- Re: [dd] Back to the charter George Michaelson
- Re: [dd] Charter issue: Introduction of new signa… Geoff Huston
- Re: [dd] Back to the charter Havard Eidnes
- Re: [dd] Charter issue: synchronization between p… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [dd] Back to the charter Wes Hardaker