IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dd] [Ext] starting charter text for the DELEG BOF discussion

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Fri, 08 March 2024 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2112BC14F70E for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 01:00:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2xPiTtUpSM1a for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 01:00:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6107DC14F6F1 for <dd@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 01:00:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (212-147-18-59.fix.access.vtx.ch [212.147.18.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A2DD2420E4A; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:00:23 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <7D11ECF1-1EBB-480C-B960-9AE268FDB199@icann.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 09:00:23 +0000
Cc: "dd@ietf.org" <dd@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8E59D1BB-37FB-4C52-AAD8-F3755C8F1F07@rfc1035.com>
References: <yblbk7wl65k.fsf@wx.hardakers.net> <SA1PR15MB4370F1D275E94CD1AE2C8A89B3222@SA1PR15MB4370.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <CD3A8291-EE91-49AB-BBEE-9120AB4A24FC@icann.org> <79e0ce13-a573-40e4-9dda-1dc2009205ed@cs.tcd.ie> <7D11ECF1-1EBB-480C-B960-9AE268FDB199@icann.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dd/7LruWnqRSa1s24ufVO-NGVY4n9Q>
Subject: Re: [dd] [Ext] starting charter text for the DELEG BOF discussion
X-BeenThere: dd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Delegation <dd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 09:00:29 -0000


> On 8 Mar 2024, at 00:13, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
> 
>> "Enabling better use of encrypted transports for DNS and other
>> encrypted transport protocols is a specific goal of DELEG."
> 
> Does anyone object to adding this language to the end of the proposed charter?

Yes. Better than what? And how are "encrypted transports for DNS” materially different to “other encrypted transport protocols”? At least in a DNS setting. I also think it’ll be wildly out of scope for DELEG to be chartered to encourage/enable/facilitate the use of encrypted transport protocols for non-DNS purposes.

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status